There are only two antenna connectors on the base station. One of the N connectors is for the GPS antenna... I'm not sure about the 4th, off hand, but you definitely only need a dual polarity antenna.
On Apr 30, 2017 6:09 PM, "Jason McKemie" <[email protected]> wrote: So, I bit the bullet and bought a starter kit. I haven't picked up a sector antenna as of yet though. The base station appears to have 4 N connectors, but the antennas are all standard dual-pol. Are there just two unused connectors, or am I looking at the wrong antennas? On Sat, Apr 29, 2017 at 7:01 PM, David <[email protected]> wrote: > "Bridge Mode" is not actual layer 2 mode. It tunnels DHCP traffic and > perhaps other traffic between the CPE and the Base stating data interface > so that you can use Powercode or something similar to hand out addresses. I > set it up, and it works for DHCP just fine. The device you plug into the > CPE still gets an EPC ip address (the EPC is the cloud management server > or it can also run on your own server, it is required and tunnels to the > base station). > > They are making lots of progress, and if they follow through with new LTE > revisions, this may very well may be the next new thing. Right now, its a > work in progress, but works to sell internet for residential customers and > we are happy with it for our needs. > > We power them with a Netonix, off of a POE port. Works great. Just set the > port to 48VH (only the first port on a WS-8-150, or only the first 4 ports > on a WS-12-250 up to Revision F, and only the first 2 ports on WS-12-250 > after revision F) and connect orange and blue pairs to POSITIVE and green > and brown pairs to NEGATIVE. You eat up one port on your Netonix if you > have a small one, since you still have to connect the data cable of course > (data port is labeled "WAN" port on the outside). > > Hope that helps someone experimenting. There are quite a few tweaks we had > to do to make them work. Plan on 2 to 4 days of messing with it. Support is > responsive. > > David > > On Fri, Apr 28, 2017 at 1:12 PM, Joe Novak <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Eventually there will be a 1/dollar per month fee per user for the Cloud >> EPC. They are working on a local EPC option but it's not ironed out yet. >> The monthly user fee is not being charged yet as far as I know. >> >> >> Joe >> >> On Fri, Apr 28, 2017 at 3:58 PM, Mitch Koep <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> Are there any hidden fees >>> >>> like monthly, cpe based, AP based, number of users? >>> >>> Core controller? >>> >>> Thanks >>> >>> >>> >>> On 04/28/2017 02:59 PM, Jerry Head wrote: >>> >>> True. >>> >>> >>> On 4/28/2017 2:43 PM, Mathew Howard wrote: >>> >>> Yeah, but the thing I didn't realize before I ordered, was that there's >>> actually no reason you need to use the Baicells power cable - the eNB does >>> come with the power connector, which can easily be put on cable of the >>> appropriate type. >>> >>> You do need an antenna though... I used a KPP sector. >>> >>> On Fri, Apr 28, 2017 at 2:35 PM, Jerry Head <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> You also need a power cable as the base station is not POE. >>>> >>>> >>>> On 4/28/2017 2:30 PM, Tim Alexander wrote: >>>> >>>> Hi Jason, >>>> >>>> Just to be clear, you probably know this, you do need an antenna for >>>> the AP itself. >>>> >>>> The firmware is very much in beta. Rate limiting, proper l3 routing, l2 >>>> bridging (or what passes for it in LTE world), snmp, and comprehensive >>>> management are still very much works in progress. The cloud EPC also tends >>>> to have issues and goes down randomly. They are bringing up more instances >>>> in Microsoft's azure cloud and altering some of the ways the tunnel works >>>> they said recently. >>>> >>>> >>>> *Timothy Alexander* >>>> *Amplex Internet* >>>> E-mail: [email protected] >>>> Office: 419-837-5015 <%28419%29%20837-5015> >>>> Mailing Address: >>>> 22690 Pemberville Rd >>>> Luckey, OH 43443 >>>> On 4/28/2017 3:23 PM, Josh Luthman wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Mitch Koep >>> >>> A Better Wireless218-851-8689 <(218)%20851-8689> cell >>> >>> >> > > > -- > David Kunat >
