Oops, he answered it first!
> On Apr 30, 2017, at 3:13 PM, Mathew Howard <mhoward...@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> There are only two antenna connectors on the base station. One of the N 
> connectors is for the GPS antenna... I'm not sure about the 4th, off hand, 
> but you definitely only need a dual polarity antenna. 
> 
> On Apr 30, 2017 6:09 PM, "Jason McKemie" <j.mcke...@veloxinetbroadband.com> 
> wrote:
> So, I bit the bullet and bought a starter kit.  I haven't picked up a sector 
> antenna as of yet though.  The base station appears to have 4 N connectors, 
> but the antennas are all standard dual-pol.  Are there just two unused 
> connectors, or am I looking at the wrong antennas?
> 
> On Sat, Apr 29, 2017 at 7:01 PM, David <m...@davidkunat.com> wrote:
>> "Bridge Mode" is not actual layer 2 mode. It tunnels DHCP traffic and 
>> perhaps other traffic between the CPE and the Base stating data interface so 
>> that you can use Powercode or something similar to hand out addresses. I set 
>> it up, and it works for DHCP just fine. The device you plug into the CPE 
>> still gets an EPC  ip address (the EPC is the cloud management server or it 
>> can also run on your own server, it is required and tunnels to the base 
>> station).
>> 
>> They are making lots of progress, and if they follow through with new LTE 
>> revisions, this may very well may be the next new thing. Right now, its a 
>> work in progress, but works to sell internet for residential customers and 
>> we are happy with it for our needs.
>> 
>> We power them with a Netonix, off of a POE port. Works great. Just set the 
>> port to 48VH (only the first port on a WS-8-150, or only the first 4 ports 
>> on a WS-12-250 up to Revision F, and only the first 2 ports on WS-12-250 
>> after revision F) and connect orange and blue pairs to POSITIVE and green 
>> and brown pairs to NEGATIVE. You eat up one port on your Netonix if you have 
>> a small one, since you still have to connect the data cable of course (data 
>> port is labeled "WAN" port on the outside).
>> 
>> Hope that helps someone experimenting. There are quite a few tweaks we had 
>> to do to make them work. Plan on 2 to 4 days of messing with it. Support is 
>> responsive.
>> 
>> David
>> 
>>> On Fri, Apr 28, 2017 at 1:12 PM, Joe Novak <jno...@lrcomm.com> wrote:
>>> Eventually there will be a 1/dollar per month fee per user for the Cloud 
>>> EPC. They are working on a local EPC option but it's not ironed out yet. 
>>> The monthly user fee is not being charged yet as far as I know.
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Joe
>>> 
>>>> On Fri, Apr 28, 2017 at 3:58 PM, Mitch Koep <af...@abwisp.com> wrote:
>>>> Are there any hidden fees
>>>> 
>>>> like monthly, cpe based, AP based, number of users?
>>>> 
>>>> Core controller?
>>>> 
>>>> Thanks
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>>> On 04/28/2017 02:59 PM, Jerry Head wrote:
>>>>> True.
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>>> On 4/28/2017 2:43 PM, Mathew Howard wrote:
>>>>>> Yeah, but the thing I didn't realize before I ordered, was that there's 
>>>>>> actually no reason you need to use the Baicells power cable - the eNB 
>>>>>> does come with the power connector, which can easily be put on cable of 
>>>>>> the appropriate type.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> You do need an antenna though... I used a KPP sector.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> On Fri, Apr 28, 2017 at 2:35 PM, Jerry Head <li...@blountbroadband.com> 
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>> You also need a power cable as the base station is not POE.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> On 4/28/2017 2:30 PM, Tim Alexander wrote:
>>>>>>>> Hi Jason,
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> Just to be clear, you probably know this, you do need an antenna for 
>>>>>>>> the AP itself.
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> The firmware is very much in beta. Rate limiting, proper l3 routing, 
>>>>>>>> l2 bridging (or what passes for it in LTE world), snmp, and 
>>>>>>>> comprehensive management are still very much works in progress. The 
>>>>>>>> cloud EPC also tends to have issues and goes down randomly. They are 
>>>>>>>> bringing up more instances in Microsoft's azure cloud and altering 
>>>>>>>> some of the ways the tunnel works they said recently. 
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> Timothy Alexander
>>>>>>>> Amplex Internet
>>>>>>>> E-mail: t...@amplex.net
>>>>>>>> Office: 419-837-5015
>>>>>>>> Mailing Address:
>>>>>>>> 22690 Pemberville Rd
>>>>>>>> Luckey, OH 43443
>>>>>>>> On 4/28/2017 3:23 PM, Josh Luthman wrote:
>>>> 
>>>> -- 
>>>> Mitch Koep
>>>> 
>>>> A Better Wireless
>>>> 218-851-8689 cell
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> -- 
>> David Kunat
> 
> 

Reply via email to