Shouldn't be a problem. The pipe only gets power from the first one in the chain, the others don't accept power from other injectors down the chain.
On Wed, May 24, 2017 at 2:20 PM, Matt <[email protected]> wrote: > If the first 3 in the chain are provided 52 volts and the next 3 are > powered by 26 volts and they are all chained too the same basic sync pipe > that is not an issue? These will be mostly powering PxP450i gear so I > guess we will see how it goes. > > > > On Thu, May 4, 2017 at 6:49 PM, Forrest Christian (List Account) < > [email protected]> wrote: > >> There is one caveat: >> >> The pre-revision I hardware is likely to cause a bit of ringing on the >> sync pulse. The 450i does not like this. Depending on the cable length, >> how they are installed, etc, etc, etc, the 450i may never accept the pulse >> as valid due to this ringing. >> >> This is the change which the I injectors fixed. >> >> Daisy chaning revisions are not a problem, as long as they are all >> revision H or later. >> >> On Thu, May 4, 2017 at 10:28 AM, Matt <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >>> Will a PacketFlux SyncInjector 100 hardware H1 accept 48+ volts and >>> power up and provide sync to a PMP450i AP with 100mbps ethernet? >>> >> >> >> >> -- >> *Forrest Christian* *CEO**, PacketFlux Technologies, Inc.* >> Tel: 406-449-3345 | Address: 3577 Countryside Road, Helena, MT 59602 >> [email protected] | http://www.packetflux.com >> <http://www.linkedin.com/in/fwchristian> >> <http://facebook.com/packetflux> <http://twitter.com/@packetflux> >> >> > -- *Forrest Christian* *CEO**, PacketFlux Technologies, Inc.* Tel: 406-449-3345 | Address: 3577 Countryside Road, Helena, MT 59602 [email protected] | http://www.packetflux.com <http://www.linkedin.com/in/fwchristian> <http://facebook.com/packetflux> <http://twitter.com/@packetflux>
