Right. I specifically mentioned ILECs as an exemption. Few others do. I would 
imagine more minutes flow through non-legacy at some point than flow through 
legacy exclusively. That's a pretty safe bet. 




----- 
Mike Hammett 
Intelligent Computing Solutions 

Midwest Internet Exchange 

The Brothers WISP 




----- Original Message -----

From: "Chuck McCown" <[email protected]> 
To: [email protected] 
Sent: Thursday, June 1, 2017 11:47:59 AM 
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] VOIP Providers 




Well, I am an ILEC and all traffic is via trunks to the tandem. All SS7. We all 
have NECA meet point billing arrangements and NECA tariffs and the traffic 
flows over the legacy network so we all get our access payments. 

If you get a check from NECA or USAC you are probably not doing much VOIP 
except for a non regulated outbound LD service. 




From: Mike Hammett 
Sent: Thursday, June 01, 2017 10:44 AM 
To: [email protected] 
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] VOIP Providers 


Sure it is, but if it leaves an ILEC, it's probably going VoIP. There's a lot 
of calls made over cable, cellular, OTT VoIP, etc. that are only old-school for 
as little as they have to be. 

There are even fully VoIP-enabled competitive tandems out there explicitly for 
bypassing legacy tandems. 




----- 
Mike Hammett 
Intelligent Computing Solutions 

Midwest Internet Exchange 

The Brothers WISP 




----- Original Message -----

From: "Chuck McCown" <[email protected]> 
To: [email protected] 
Sent: Thursday, June 1, 2017 11:41:30 AM 
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] VOIP Providers 




You would be surprised as to how many 5ESS are still in service. The SS7 
network is as alive and well as ever. 




From: Mike Hammett 
Sent: Thursday, June 01, 2017 10:38 AM 
To: [email protected] 
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] VOIP Providers 


Much of the PSTN is no longer a bunch of DSxs, but VoIP. Sure, anything 
connected to the tandem is DSx, but beyond that, little of it is aside from 
POTS. 




----- 
Mike Hammett 
Intelligent Computing Solutions 

Midwest Internet Exchange 

The Brothers WISP 




----- Original Message -----

From: "Chuck McCown" <[email protected]> 
To: [email protected] 
Sent: Thursday, June 1, 2017 11:34:50 AM 
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] VOIP Providers 




Once it hits the PSTN the quality is high and stays high. 

I have spent the last 38 years working for the regulated side of the industry. 
So I am biased, however hard to argue against SS7/DS0 for speed and quality of 
connection. 

If it is G.711/DS0 full rate PCM from one end to the other there will not be 
jitter or latency. 

So that I way I want VLAN to SIP gateway that is connected to a regional tandem 
if I can get it. 

I can create this myself, I already have rack space, colocation, transport and 
connections. But there is no money in it for me to go to that work. 




From: Faisal Imtiaz 
Sent: Thursday, June 01, 2017 10:27 AM 
To: [email protected] 
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] VOIP Providers 



>>>i f the VLAN covered from the POTS to the SIP gateway that was connected to 
>>>the tandem, the quality should be pretty high 

Yes, sort off.... 

Explanation:- 
There are two legs to every call... one leg would be from the "switch" or 
"Proxy" to the Customer CPE, and the second leg would be from the "switch" or 
"Proxy" to the Voice Gateway (VOIP to TDM)... 

Making sure that the network connection is clean and of high quality on both 
legs will add to the quality, along with the Codec Conversion ... 

Making sure that the 2nd leg is of high quality network connection gets more 
challenging to do when terminating Nation Wide LD. 

VOIP / TDM Gateways are becoming less and less, since more and more the the 
Telco's are using Sonus Switches, thus keeping VOIP as packets end to end. 
Most of the larger public network connectivity on Fiber (as you pointed out) is 
of high quality and as long as it is congestion free it is just fine... 

In our experience, most of the voice issues tend to come from Codec Conversions 
(especially when they are done multiple times) and or High Jitter .... latency 
tends not to be an issue... (Packet loss can be a prevailing factor, but these 
days it is becoming more rare, unless you are traversing two IP Transit 
Providers who have over subscribed interconnection ports). 

Regards 

Faisal Imtiaz 
Snappy Internet & Telecom 
7266 SW 48 Street 
Miami, FL 33155 
Tel: 305 663 5518 x 232 

Help-desk: (305)663-5518 Option 2 or Email: [email protected] 
----- Original Message -----



From: "Chuck McCown" <[email protected]> 
To: [email protected] 
Sent: Thursday, June 1, 2017 12:14:49 PM 
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] VOIP Providers 




<blockquote>



If the VLAN covered from the POTS to the SIP gateway that was connected to the 
tandem, the quality should be pretty high. Better than using best-effort public 
routing to the gateway. 

But since everything is fiber these days and everything tends to work very 
well, it may not be a difference that would be noticeable. 




From: Faisal Imtiaz 
Sent: Thursday, June 01, 2017 10:10 AM 
To: [email protected] 
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] VOIP Providers 



@ $7 is a decent price for this type of service, keeping in mind that the whole 
picture could be different once the one time charges and any minimum commits 
are taken into account. 

Figure about $3-$4 per sub as a 'cost' of platform. $1 for DID + Caller ID 
lookup, and the rest would be used for mou's, I am assuming that taxes & fees 
along with E911 charges would be over and above the $7. 

At the end of the day it is going to be about Volume, i.e. 100 subs vs 1000 
subs, somewhere about $2500-3k/month spending the balance between doing the 
flat rate style arrangement vs taking the risk on mou arbitrage will start to 
change. 

In regards to a 'local' provider, vlan providing quality would not be accurate, 
and quite possibly a myth. It only would address a very small portion of the 
actual path.. The quality greatly depends on the providers setup, i.e. how many 
codec conversions are taking place in the Voice path, and what is the network 
connectivity to the VOIP to TDM gateway or Sonus/ACME Switch path looks like. 

Folks commonly mistake in looking at the network path to the Proxy, or the call 
control data path, while the actual quality of the Voice is dependent on the 
network path of the Voice traffic, which is not the same as the call control 
traffic. 

It has taken a long time to learn the intricacies of VOIP, what affects it and 
how to identify them. 

We will be more than happy to work with you on this project of that makes 
sense. 


Regards 

Faisal Imtiaz 
Snappy Internet & Telecom 
7266 SW 48 Street 
Miami, FL 33155 
Tel: 305 663 5518 x 232 

Help-desk: (305)663-5518 Option 2 or Email: [email protected] 
----- Original Message -----


<blockquote>
From: "Chuck McCown" <[email protected]> 
To: [email protected] 
Sent: Thursday, June 1, 2017 11:17:31 AM 
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] VOIP Providers 

</blockquote>


<blockquote>



We have no idea how many will want this. Currently we have over 5K on pots. 
We have a provider that is willing to do it in the $7 range. They are already 
serving some of our other areas. 
I figured if I could VLAN it to a local provider the quality ought to be 
perfect. 




From: Faisal Imtiaz 
Sent: Thursday, June 01, 2017 9:00 AM 
To: [email protected] 
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] VOIP Providers 



Fair enough, that explains why you are looking for this.. 

Care to share Price Target ? and Qty / Volume commit ? 

Regards. 

Faisal Imtiaz 
Snappy Internet & Telecom 
7266 SW 48 Street 
Miami, FL 33155 
Tel: 305 663 5518 x 232 

Help-desk: (305)663-5518 Option 2 or Email: [email protected] 
----- Original Message -----


<blockquote>
From: "Chuck McCown" <[email protected]> 
To: [email protected] 
Sent: Thursday, June 1, 2017 10:47:41 AM 
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] VOIP Providers 

</blockquote>


<blockquote>



We are starting to offer stand alone broadband under the neca CBOL tariff. Some 
of those people will still want telephone service. So we need a non regulated 
VOIP product that will not traverse our regulated equipment. 




From: Faisal Imtiaz 
Sent: Wednesday, May 31, 2017 9:30 PM 
To: [email protected] 
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] VOIP Providers 



Care to share on-list or off-list as to what is the core reason why you are 
looking for such ? 

i.e. a regulatory issue ? A Technical Issue ? or a perceived convenience issue 
? 

We can easily provide you with such a service, but depending on the core issue 
you are trying to solve it may or may not be a good working arrangement. 

Regards. 

Faisal Imtiaz 
Snappy Internet & Telecom 
7266 SW 48 Street 
Miami, FL 33155 
Tel: 305 663 5518 x 232 

Help-desk: (305)663-5518 Option 2 or Email: [email protected] 
----- Original Message -----


<blockquote>
From: "Chuck McCown" <[email protected]> 
To: [email protected] 
Sent: Tuesday, May 30, 2017 5:44:36 PM 
Subject: [AFMUG] VOIP Providers 

</blockquote>


<blockquote>



I need a wholesale voip provider to serve my ILEC territory in Utah. I would 
port my local 801-789 numbers to the VOIP provider. 

We need unlimited LD and solid 911. Would prefer someone local. 

So, before I give XMission a call I thought I would put this out there. 
</blockquote>

</blockquote>

</blockquote>


</blockquote>



Reply via email to