I know zero on that. That's all I have to say about that On Tue, Jun 6, 2017 at 9:48 PM, Adam Moffett <[email protected]> wrote:
> Is encapsulating eoip a multi-threaded task? > > I wonder if there's something on the wiki that tells us what tasks or > processes benefit from more cores. > > > > ------ Original Message ------ > From: "Steve Jones" <[email protected]> > To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]> > Sent: 6/6/2017 10:27:03 PM > Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Need a better mikrotik tunnel than EOIP > > I'm going to CCR1072s Hopefully the issue resolves > > On Tue, Jun 6, 2017 at 5:45 PM, Chris Wright <[email protected]> wrote: > >> I get a hair over 200mbps over encrypted EOIP on a pair of CCR1036’s with >> no optimizing (can they be optimized, anyone?). >> >> >> >> Chris Wright >> >> Network Administrator >> >> >> >> *From:* Af [mailto:[email protected]] *On Behalf Of *Steve Jones >> *Sent:* Tuesday, June 06, 2017 3:30 PM >> *To:* [email protected] >> *Subject:* [AFMUG] Need a better mikrotik tunnel than EOIP >> >> >> >> For whatever reason, my tunnel has collapsed. throughput went from a >> consistent 80 percent of our limiting upstream (100mbps) now over 10 and it >> goes latency shit >> >> I don't know if its the tunnel as a singularity or if its saturation of >> the upstream causing some issues >> >> Fuckall when you have super asymmetric bandwidth and saturate the little >> one >> >> >> >> EOIP had too much overhead to run encryption on the rb1100ahx2, we are >> switching to the CCRs now so it my be better, but I'm finding for external >> transit, EOIP doesn't seem to be the right hammer >> > >
