You might find this article of interest. http://www.stubarea51.net/2015/10/16/10-gbps-of-layer-2-throughput-is-possible-using-mikrotiks-eoip-tunnel/
Regards. Faisal Imtiaz Snappy Internet & Telecom 7266 SW 48 Street Miami, FL 33155 Tel: 305 663 5518 x 232 Help-desk: (305)663-5518 Option 2 or Email: [email protected] > From: "Steve Jones" <[email protected]> > To: [email protected] > Sent: Tuesday, June 6, 2017 10:27:03 PM > Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Need a better mikrotik tunnel than EOIP > I'm going to CCR1072s Hopefully the issue resolves > On Tue, Jun 6, 2017 at 5:45 PM, Chris Wright < [email protected] > wrote: >> I get a hair over 200mbps over encrypted EOIP on a pair of CCR1036’s with no >> optimizing (can they be optimized, anyone?). >> Chris Wright >> Network Administrator >> From: Af [mailto: [email protected] ] On Behalf Of Steve Jones >> Sent: Tuesday, June 06, 2017 3:30 PM >> To: [email protected] >> Subject: [AFMUG] Need a better mikrotik tunnel than EOIP >> For whatever reason, my tunnel has collapsed. throughput went from a >> consistent >> 80 percent of our limiting upstream (100mbps) now over 10 and it goes latency >> shit >> I don't know if its the tunnel as a singularity or if its saturation of the >> upstream causing some issues >> Fuckall when you have super asymmetric bandwidth and saturate the little one >> EOIP had too much overhead to run encryption on the rb1100ahx2, we are >> switching >> to the CCRs now so it my be better, but I'm finding for external transit, >> EOIP >> doesn't seem to be the right hammer
