lmao, yeah, i was talking to a railroad guy... leadership there thinks ubnt is good gear too for ptmp stuff. Its crazy, the positive train control stuff had basically an unlimited budget, all good gear, now theyre looking at ubnt as an option, cambium is where theyre going to go, but fekballs
On Tue, Jul 11, 2017 at 2:17 PM, Cameron Crum <[email protected]> wrote: > BNSF is launching their own wisp. > > On Tue, Jul 11, 2017 at 2:15 PM, Forrest Christian (List Account) < > [email protected]> wrote: > >> I wish BN was so easy. From everything i hear expensive and takes >> forever, and they want lots of paperwork. I think a new comm site on >> Federal land (including the environmental assessment) might be easier from >> the stories I hear. >> >> It took me a few months to even get them to respond last time I tried, at >> which point I decided wireless was easier. >> >> On Jul 11, 2017 11:30 AM, "Chuck McCown" <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> Easy. Find out who owns it. An active UPRR longitudinal ROW is >>> expensive but easy to do. >>> If there is no RR easement any more, then you just deal with the land >>> owner. >>> >>> *From:* Jason McKemie >>> *Sent:* Tuesday, July 11, 2017 11:28 AM >>> *To:* [email protected] >>> *Subject:* [AFMUG] Reclaimed rail corridor access >>> >>> There is a hiking / biking trail going in on an old railroad corridor >>> that I might like to run fiber along. Does anyone have experience with >>> this? Or is is generally too much of a hassle to deal with? >>> >> >
