lol that's always step 1. I wish you could just do global stp off On Wed, Jul 19, 2017 at 12:31 PM, Jesse DuPont < [email protected]> wrote:
> Might make sure spanning tree is disabled on the MT bridge so its BPDUs > don't interact with any spanning tree that might be enabled on the SAF. > Otherwise, shouldn't be a huge deal. > > *Jesse DuPont* > > Network Architect > email: [email protected] > Celerity Networks LLC > > Celerity Broadband LLC > Like us! facebook.com/celeritynetworksllc > > Like us! facebook.com/celeritybroadband > On 7/19/17 10:20 AM, Steve Jones wrote: > > So ive been dealing with the SAFs and the mikrotiks being uppity with one > another. > SAF has a gigabit port, but it only offers the option to lock it to 100, > not gigabit. > so I have the mikrotiks set, just not the otherside, the port still flaps > on both radios > > what was happening is everytime it flaps, the interface dropped in ospf > and went neighbor down, rerouting traffic then coming back up > > what I did was made a bridge, added that port to it, and put the ospf ip > on the bridge itself, this allows the port to flap without the ospf > interface going down until we work throught the issue with SAF > > I'm wondering if this is causing some other harm having it on the bridge, > rather than the physical port > > >
