I have the same experience as Brett. On Mon, Aug 7, 2017 at 2:06 PM, Brett A Mansfield < [email protected]> wrote:
> I have a 1500M link that is currently at 4 9's using the 35cm model. I get > about 1Gb throughput including overhead. > > Thank you, > Brett A Mansfield > > On Aug 7, 2017, at 2:27 PM, Eric Kuhnke <[email protected]> wrote: > > Still wouldn't do it... 60 GHz with 2ft/60cm dishes is good for 900-1100 > meters max in rain zone D with high reliability where you can actually > treat it like a fiber cable, and it won't drop out except in truly > exceptional rainstorms. In the five nines per year statistical range. > > 1100 meters = 0.68 miles > > And definitely not in rain zone F with its higher mm/hour rates. > > > > > On Mon, Aug 7, 2017 at 12:55 PM, Jaime Solorza <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> Friend asking with 2 ft dishes.... >> >> Jaime Solorza >> >> On Aug 7, 2017 1:45 PM, "Eric Kuhnke" <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> 1.9 miles 60 GHz with those tiny antennas? >>> >>> I wouldn't even try that distance with the Bridgewave 60 GHz product >>> with 60cm dishes on both ends in rain zone C... Forget F. >>> >>> 100 Mbps at 1.9 miles seems like a good fit for two AF5X with the >>> smallest dishes, does it have to be 60 for some reason? >>> >>> >>> >>> On Mon, Aug 7, 2017 at 12:42 PM, Jaime Solorza < >>> [email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> Can these 60Ghz do 100 mbps at 1.9 miles in my area? Zone F >>>> >>>> Jaime Solorza >>>> >>> >>> >
