I had to relocate and shield a Bridge wave 80GHz radio using building corner due to interference... original installer mounted them one above the other with about 1 ft separation vertically. So test in lab first to get idea of how much space you need ...
On Oct 1, 2017 9:12 AM, "Mathew Howard" <[email protected]> wrote: > They're still only 18dbi according to the data sheet... unless I was > reading that wrong. That's the same as the 30 degree sector. > > While you may not be able to do much more than 1Gbps symmetrical, most of > us don't actually need symmetrical connections. > > I'm a little sceptical that ABAB is going to work well... we have two of > the PTP radios back to back, and they definitely interfere with eachother > if they're on the same channel. I guess it might work with more vertical > separation, but I couldn't easily try that (I think we only have about 4' > between them... I'd need a taller tower to get more in this case). > > On Sun, Oct 1, 2017 at 9:38 AM, Mike Hammett <[email protected]> wrote: > >> The new one has a beamforming antenna with more gain. >> >> >> >> ----- >> Mike Hammett >> Intelligent Computing Solutions <http://www.ics-il.com/> >> <https://www.facebook.com/ICSIL> >> <https://plus.google.com/+IntelligentComputingSolutionsDeKalb> >> <https://www.linkedin.com/company/intelligent-computing-solutions> >> <https://twitter.com/ICSIL> >> Midwest Internet Exchange <http://www.midwest-ix.com/> >> <https://www.facebook.com/mdwestix> >> <https://www.linkedin.com/company/midwest-internet-exchange> >> <https://twitter.com/mdwestix> >> The Brothers WISP <http://www.thebrotherswisp.com/> >> <https://www.facebook.com/thebrotherswisp> >> >> >> <https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCXSdfxQv7SpoRQYNyLwntZg> >> ------------------------------ >> *From: *"Stefan Englhardt" <[email protected]> >> *To: *[email protected] >> *Sent: *Sunday, October 1, 2017 5:57:03 AM >> *Subject: *Re: [AFMUG] MetroLinq 2.5G 60-BF-18 (120 Degree Sector) >> >> The ptmp-sector has very low gain compared to the ptp product. So cpes >> have to be very close. Hard to find more than 8 clients this near ... >> >> > -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- >> > Von: Af [mailto:[email protected]] Im Auftrag von [email protected] >> > Gesendet: Sonntag, 1. Oktober 2017 09:22 >> > An: [email protected] >> > Betreff: Re: [AFMUG] MetroLinq 2.5G 60-BF-18 (120 Degree Sector) >> > >> > Ignitenet uses 2 Ghz channels, so there are only three channels >> available, but a >> > vendor representative has stated that you can reuse frequencies in an >> ABAB >> > pattern. Of note is that even if it has 16 beams of 10 degrees, it can >> only >> > support 8 clients. It's unclear whether a later upgrade to 32 clients >> requires >> > new hardware or not. The 2.5G bandwidth is aggregate, so you cannot do >> > more than 1G symmetrical. Asymmetric speeds are supported. >> > >> > >> > Website and datasheet: >> > https://www.ignitenet.com/products/ml-2-5g-60-bf-sector/ >> > https://www.ignitenet.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/09/MetroLinq-2.5G-60- >> > BF-sector-datasheet.pdf >> > >> > Jared >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > Sent: Sunday, October 01, 2017 >> > From: "Ryan Ray" <[email protected]> >> > To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]> >> > Subject: [AFMUG] MetroLinq 2.5G 60-BF-18 (120 Degree Sector) >> > >> > Searched around and didn't see anyone talking about these. Do they work? >> > Can I put three of these up channels 2,3,4 and have 360 degree gigabit >> > coverage in 60GHz? Any gotcha's I need to know? Does frequency reuse >> work? >> > Same range as the existing point to point model? >> > >> > So many applications if this is all the case. >> >> >> >
