> No I'm not one of those weird liberals.

 

What, like a scientist 
<https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Surveys_of_scientists%27_views_on_climate_change>
 ?

 

Chris Wright

Network Administrator

 

From: Af [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Matt Hoppes
Sent: Friday, October 20, 2017 10:47 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] IgniteNet Metrolinq

 

Keep in mind weather is changing. No I'm not one of those weird liberals. But 
here in Pennsylvania we've noticed a definite difference in the amount and 
frequency of rain.


On Oct 20, 2017, at 13:42, Mike Hammett <[email protected]> wrote:

I'd use the NOAA page I linked to in my FB posts shared earlier in this thread.



-----
Mike Hammett
 <http://www.ics-il.com/> Intelligent Computing Solutions
 <https://www.facebook.com/ICSIL>  
<https://plus.google.com/+IntelligentComputingSolutionsDeKalb>  
<https://www.linkedin.com/company/intelligent-computing-solutions>  
<https://twitter.com/ICSIL> 
 <http://www.midwest-ix.com/> Midwest Internet Exchange
 <https://www.facebook.com/mdwestix>  
<https://www.linkedin.com/company/midwest-internet-exchange>  
<https://twitter.com/mdwestix> 
 <http://www.thebrotherswisp.com/> The Brothers WISP
 <https://www.facebook.com/thebrotherswisp>  
<https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCXSdfxQv7SpoRQYNyLwntZg> 





  _____  


From: [email protected]
To: [email protected]
Sent: Friday, October 20, 2017 12:40:17 PM
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] IgniteNet Metrolinq

The google...

 

From: Mike Hammett 

Sent: Friday, October 20, 2017 11:35 AM

To: [email protected] 

Subject: Re: [AFMUG] IgniteNet Metrolinq

 

Where are you looking up your rainfall specs?



-----
Mike Hammett
 <http://www.ics-il.com/> Intelligent Computing Solutions
 <https://www.facebook.com/ICSIL>  
<https://plus.google.com/+IntelligentComputingSolutionsDeKalb>  
<https://www.linkedin.com/company/intelligent-computing-solutions>  
<https://twitter.com/ICSIL> 
 <http://www.midwest-ix.com/> Midwest Internet Exchange
 <https://www.facebook.com/mdwestix>  
<https://www.linkedin.com/company/midwest-internet-exchange>  
<https://twitter.com/mdwestix> 
 <http://www.thebrotherswisp.com/> The Brothers WISP
 <https://www.facebook.com/thebrotherswisp>  
<https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCXSdfxQv7SpoRQYNyLwntZg> 





  _____  


From: [email protected]
To: [email protected]
Sent: Friday, October 20, 2017 12:33:43 PM
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] IgniteNet Metrolinq

I think both Julian Kemp and Daniel White both did rain presentations at 
AnimalFarm in years past.  Fascinating with the shape and size of the 
raindrops, and the fact that some places have continual drizzle and some have 
torrential sky floods but both will show the same amount of rainfall.  
Certainly not as simple as looking up rainfall specs for a place.  

 

From: Harold Bledsoe 

Sent: Friday, October 20, 2017 11:14 AM

To: [email protected] 

Subject: Re: [AFMUG] IgniteNet Metrolinq

 

SEA is amazingly friendly.  They get rain but not very intense. 

 

What makes it particularly challenging is that it is rain specifically across 
the path of the link.  So a 1km link that follows a typical squall line path 
will be different than a 1km link that is perpendicular to the typical squall 
line (partial path with rain vs. full path with rain).  It's cool stuff like 
this that makes it so much fun!  :-)

On Fri, Oct 20, 2017 at 10:01 AM <[email protected]> wrote:

Lesseee  365.25*24*60 = 525960 minutes.

.99999 uptime = = .00001 downtime

 

Move the decimal 5 places = 5.296 minutes per year

25.9 seconds per month.  

 

So should drop for a second a day or perhaps for half a minute a month or 7 
seconds a week etc etc.  

Be interesting to see what folks in Seattle actually see.  

 

 

From: Mike Hammett 

Sent: Friday, October 20, 2017 5:36 AM

To: [email protected] 

Subject: Re: [AFMUG] IgniteNet Metrolinq

===== 

that is good for five nines reliability at 500 to 650 meters in a Seattle-like 
rain zone. Somewhat less distance in places that have higher mm/hour rain 
rates. These are serious products that take direct 48VDC power, singlemode 
fiber connections, and have dedicated management interfaces.

=====

 

IgniteNet does all of that too.


-----
Mike Hammett
 <http://www.ics-il.com/> Intelligent Computing Solutions
 <https://www.facebook.com/ICSIL>  
<https://plus.google.com/+IntelligentComputingSolutionsDeKalb>  
<https://www.linkedin.com/company/intelligent-computing-solutions>  
<https://twitter.com/ICSIL> 
 <http://www.midwest-ix.com/> Midwest Internet Exchange
 <https://www.facebook.com/mdwestix>  
<https://www.linkedin.com/company/midwest-internet-exchange>  
<https://twitter.com/mdwestix> 
 <http://www.thebrotherswisp.com/> The Brothers WISP
 <https://www.facebook.com/thebrotherswisp>  
<https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCXSdfxQv7SpoRQYNyLwntZg> 




From: "Eric Kuhnke" <[email protected]>
To: [email protected]
Sent: Thursday, October 19, 2017 5:52:52 PM
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] IgniteNet Metrolinq

Please don't let your impression of 60 GHz be influenced by IgniteNet's silly 
USB dongle in front of a reflector, cheap stuff...  

 

Bridgewave (REMEC/Mosely) and others make much more expensive, carrier grade, 
fiber-connected 60 GHz PTP equipment that is good for five nines reliability at 
500 to 650 meters in a Seattle-like rain zone. Somewhat less distance in places 
that have higher mm/hour rain rates. These are serious products that take 
direct 48VDC power, singlemode fiber connections, and have dedicated management 
interfaces. 

 

"serious" 60 GHz equipment is built to the same standards as $15,000 80 GHz 
links and is used by a lot of large ISPs. Most of whom don't consider 
themselves to be WISPs, but rather ISPs that happen to use PTP millimeter wave 
when it is necessary or justified.

 

I have not personally seen a Metrolinq 60 GHz but I have seen photos of one 
disassembled, and it is literally a USB 802.11ad 60 GHz dongle hot glued to a 
plastic thing in front of a reflector. Scary.

 

 

 

 

On Thu, Oct 19, 2017 at 3:45 PM, Chuck McCown <[email protected]> wrote:

Well hell, that is almost TMI.  I expected as such from this band.  Sounds like 
if they increase the sensitivity of the switchover mechanism it would be a 
contender.  

From: Matt Hoppes 

Sent: Thursday, October 19, 2017 4:38 PM

To: [email protected] 

Subject: Re: [AFMUG] IgniteNet Metrolinq

Let me back up. 

 

We lose our IN link every time a bird pees. It generally holds up during 
torrential down pours. 

 

Random fog events will cause it to become trashed. 

 

The link is .6 miles. I expected it to fade from time to time. The problem for 
me is the fail over does not happen properly. 

 

It's a gosh darn USB dongle attached to a reflector dish. Don't expect too much 
out of it. 


On Oct 19, 2017, at 18:28, Rory Conaway <[email protected]> wrote:

How far is your shot?  What channel are you using?

 

Rory

 

From: Af [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Matt Hoppes


Sent: Thursday, October 19, 2017 3:26 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] IgniteNet Metrolinq

 

I disagree. We lose our IN link every time it rains. And the 5GHz does not fail 
over seemleasly at all. 

 

There is packet loss and high pings until the 60GHz finally dies. Then it 
sometimes flips. 


On Oct 19, 2017, at 17:56, Mike Hammett <[email protected]> wrote:

If a bunch of folks deploy it and do so correctly, there won't be complaining.  
;-)



-----
Mike Hammett

 <http://www.ics-il.com/> Intelligent Computing Solutions
 <https://www.facebook.com/ICSIL>  
<https://plus.google.com/+IntelligentComputingSolutionsDeKalb>  
<https://www.linkedin.com/company/intelligent-computing-solutions>  
<https://twitter.com/ICSIL> 
 <http://www.midwest-ix.com/> Midwest Internet Exchange
 <https://www.facebook.com/mdwestix>  
<https://www.linkedin.com/company/midwest-internet-exchange>  
<https://twitter.com/mdwestix> 
 <http://www.thebrotherswisp.com/> The Brothers WISP
 <https://www.facebook.com/thebrotherswisp>  
<https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCXSdfxQv7SpoRQYNyLwntZg> 





  _____  


From: "Chuck McCown" <[email protected]>


To: [email protected]
Sent: Thursday, October 19, 2017 4:55:08 PM
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] IgniteNet Metrolinq

I ain’t belivin nuthing until a bunch of folks have deployed this stuff and 
start complaining about it.  Then we will have believable data.  

 

From: Mike Hammett 

Sent: Thursday, October 19, 2017 3:32 PM

To: [email protected] 

Subject: Re: [AFMUG] IgniteNet Metrolinq

 

https://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Documents/bulletins/oet70/oet70a.pdf



page 7 vs. page 15



-----
Mike Hammett

 <http://www.ics-il.com/> Intelligent Computing Solutions
 <https://www.facebook.com/ICSIL>  
<https://plus.google.com/+IntelligentComputingSolutionsDeKalb>  
<https://www.linkedin.com/company/intelligent-computing-solutions>  
<https://twitter.com/ICSIL> 
 <http://www.midwest-ix.com/> Midwest Internet Exchange
 <https://www.facebook.com/mdwestix>  
<https://www.linkedin.com/company/midwest-internet-exchange>  
<https://twitter.com/mdwestix> 
 <http://www.thebrotherswisp.com/> The Brothers WISP
 <https://www.facebook.com/thebrotherswisp>  
<https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCXSdfxQv7SpoRQYNyLwntZg> 





  _____  


From: "Chris Wright" <[email protected]>


To: [email protected]
Sent: Thursday, October 19, 2017 4:28:48 PM
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] IgniteNet Metrolinq

Between 50-80GHz, oxygen attenuates the EM spectrum significantly more than 
water. Not to say that it doesn’t contribute at all to fade, but at 300 meters 
you’d probably only ever go down if Poseiden himself took offense to your 
client.

 

 <http://windowsil.org/wp-content/uploads/2008/03/atm_absorption.gif> 
http://windowsil.org/wp-content/uploads/2008/03/atm_absorption.gif

 

Chris Wright

Network Administrator

 

From: Af [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Adam Moffett


Sent: Thursday, October 19, 2017 1:19 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] IgniteNet Metrolinq

 

This link would be just under 300 meters.  Will I ever go down for rain? 

 

 

------ Original Message ------

From: "Mike Hammett" <[email protected]>

To: [email protected]

Sent: 10/19/2017 4:17:00 PM

Subject: Re: [AFMUG] IgniteNet Metrolinq

 

Yes, it's still an issue. To say otherwise is dumb.



-----
Mike Hammett

 <http://www.ics-il.com/> Intelligent Computing Solutions
 <https://www.facebook.com/ICSIL>  
<https://plus.google.com/+IntelligentComputingSolutionsDeKalb>  
<https://www.linkedin.com/company/intelligent-computing-solutions>  
<https://twitter.com/ICSIL> 
 <http://www.midwest-ix.com/> Midwest Internet Exchange
 <https://www.facebook.com/mdwestix>  
<https://www.linkedin.com/company/midwest-internet-exchange>  
<https://twitter.com/mdwestix> 
 <http://www.thebrotherswisp.com/> The Brothers WISP
 <https://www.facebook.com/thebrotherswisp>  
<https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCXSdfxQv7SpoRQYNyLwntZg> 





  _____  


From: "Adam Moffett" <[email protected]>


To: [email protected]
Sent: Thursday, October 19, 2017 3:16:09 PM
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] IgniteNet Metrolinq

Is rain fade an issue?  

 

I just read an article claiming that the atmospheric attenuation at 60ghz is so 
great that at any range where 60ghz will operate the rain fade is insignificant.

 

 

------ Original Message ------

From: "Carl Peterson" <[email protected]>

To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>

Sent: 10/19/2017 2:58:56 PM

Subject: Re: [AFMUG] IgniteNet Metrolinq

 

Yes, and the LR brackets.  They should just drop the regular bracket and make 
everyone order the decent ones.  

 

On Thu, Oct 19, 2017 at 2:46 PM, Adam Moffett <[email protected]> wrote:

At 1300m will I really need a scope to align it?

 

 

------ Original Message ------

From: "Chris Wright" <[email protected]>

To: [email protected]

Sent: 10/19/2017 2:41:28 PM

Subject: Re: [AFMUG] IgniteNet Metrolinq

 

I have a 1300 meter link on PTP60-35 radios doing -59/-61. Very happy with 
them. The mounts they come with are trash. Get the “long range” brackets and 
alignment scope.

 

Chris Wright

Network Administrator

 

From: Af [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Adam Moffett
Sent: Thursday, October 19, 2017 11:12 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: [AFMUG] IgniteNet Metrolinq

 

I have a microwave shot about 3 blocks long, so 60ghz seems like an option.

 

Have any of you tried IgniteNet?  Has it been reliable for you?

 

I don't actually need a gigabit in this case, I just need it to be up.

 

 





 

-- 

Carl Peterson

PORT NETWORKS

401 E Pratt St, Ste 2553 
<https://maps.google.com/?q=401+E+Pratt+%0D+St,+Ste+2553____%0D+Baltimore,+%0D+MD+21202&entry=gmail&source=g>
 

Baltimore, MD 21202 
<https://maps.google.com/?q=401+E+Pratt+%0D+St,+Ste+2553____%0D+Baltimore,+%0D+MD+21202&entry=gmail&source=g>
 

(410) 637-3707 <tel:(410)%20637-3707>  

 

 

Reply via email to