I will give Harold that. At no point have I ever felt like he's tried to hide anything from us.
> On Oct 20, 2017, at 09:34, Mike Hammett <[email protected]> wrote: > > They've been very forward with their issues. There really isn't any mystery > to it. > > > > ----- > Mike Hammett > Intelligent Computing Solutions > > Midwest Internet Exchange > > The Brothers WISP > > > > > From: "Carl Peterson" <[email protected]> > To: [email protected] > Sent: Friday, October 20, 2017 7:16:19 AM > Subject: Re: [AFMUG] IgniteNet Metrolinq > > I think they have huge variations in quality. We have one link that would > never work right similar to what Matt describes. Took almost a year for them > to admit it was hardware and then they RMAd it. No issues with the > replacement Works great. No issues. We figured they had the hardware > issues fixed and spun the wheel again. Just like the first one but I don't > have the time to deal with it. Going to stick with Siklu at twice the price > for now. > >> On Fri, Oct 20, 2017 at 7:13 AM, Matt Hoppes >> <[email protected]> wrote: >> All stable now. What did you have to do to make them stable? I'm ready to >> rip out and never out back in two weeks. >> >> Especially when things got cold. The dongle just locks up on me. >> >> > On Oct 20, 2017, at 02:03, Stefan Englhardt <[email protected]> wrote: >> > >> > We have 3 links in operation. Gen1 and Gen2 HW. All below 500m. All work >> > stable now. Quality is MT/UBNT like. You see this with alignment. It just >> > is not as precise compared to licensed or af5x. The new mount is better >> > but sharp edged. It is great for the price. >> > >> > 60Ghz is a great option as it keeps 5GHz free... >> > >> > >> > -------- Ursprüngliche Nachricht -------- >> > Von: Rory Conaway <[email protected]> >> > Datum: 20.10.17 07:02 (GMT+01:00) >> > An: [email protected] >> > Betreff: Re: [AFMUG] IgniteNet Metrolinq >> > > > > > -- > Carl Peterson > > PORT NETWORKS > > 401 E Pratt St, Ste 2553 > > Baltimore, MD 21202 > > (410) 637-3707 > >
