I'd assume he's just stripping the wires in the cat5 and wiring it directly in... at least that's what I'd do. Of course using a GigE-POE-APC would work, and it would get you surge suppression on the DC line, but I'm thinking it would probably make more sense to use a DCSS-APC instead.
On Tue, Oct 24, 2017 at 8:58 AM, Josh Baird <[email protected]> wrote: > Thanks for the replies everyone. Standard DC terminals and SFP's would be > nice so we could use something like DFP-1246. > > George - what are you using to inject the power into the CAT5 at the > bottom? A PowerInjector or a GigE-POE-APC? > > On Tue, Oct 24, 2017 at 1:52 AM, Forrest Christian (List Account) < > [email protected]> wrote: > >> In addition to what everyone else suggested, you should be able to power >> these with either a powerinjector+sync (4 ports), or a rackinjector with >> the standard injection card with standard CAT5. >> >> -forrest >> >> On Mon, Oct 23, 2017 at 7:36 PM, Josh Baird <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> Those of you who have Baicells deployed, how are you powering the base >>> station? >>> >>> Are you running something like 14/2 up the tower and providing -/+48VDC >>> directly? >>> >>> Ugh - I thought the eNB had SFP's, but it looks like I need to provide >>> data over CAT5/6? >>> >>> >>> >> >> >> -- >> *Forrest Christian* *CEO**, PacketFlux Technologies, Inc.* >> Tel: 406-449-3345 | Address: 3577 Countryside Road, Helena, MT 59602 >> <https://maps.google.com/?q=3577+Countryside+Road,+Helena,+MT+59602&entry=gmail&source=g> >> [email protected] | http://www.packetflux.com >> <http://www.linkedin.com/in/fwchristian> >> <http://facebook.com/packetflux> <http://twitter.com/@packetflux> >> >> >
