I think "tribute car" is the key phrase here.

On Sunday, November 19, 2017, Philip Rankin <[email protected]> wrote:

> Chuck, I can’t answer your real question. Sorry. But I am a car collector
> and depending on the configuration of tha Superbird, it may be worth in
> excess of $250K. Quite possibly over $1M. Please be very careful there. It
> could be possible that you’re worrying about the wrong funding scourge!
>
>
>
>
> On Sat, Nov 18, 2017 at 6:54 PM <[email protected]
> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','[email protected]');>> wrote:
>
>> I am sure each state has its own rules.  Thanks for asking.  I send a
>> query to my tax lawyer and my estate lawyer.
>> I hope he has not already formally taken possession.
>>
>> *From:* Steve Jones
>> *Sent:* Saturday, November 18, 2017 5:48 PM
>> *To:* [email protected]
>> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] OT Quandry
>> I just got off with my mother, she doesnt remember the specific name.
>> This is in illinois so may be different. Its was a pretty big chunk.
>> Mom stressed though to get to an artorney yesterday. The trust had to be
>> established before formally taking possesion of the money. It had to go
>> directly to the trust.
>> Had she just cashed the check into an account while setting things up it
>> would have made her ineligible for further aid. This was around 70k, but
>> would have made it virtually impossible to get back on the aid.
>> Id say get with an attorney before the shipping is arranged, that may
>> constitute taking possession of the award and be too late.
>>
>> Hers was not a prize award, it was an aggregat of payments she was
>> supposed to be recieving while her pos father was alive, when he died the
>> government made retroactive payments. So it may not be the same scenario.
>>
>> I can give you offlist name of the law firm here in illinois if you want
>>
>>
>> On Nov 18, 2017 6:28 PM, <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>> If there is any chance you could come up with the type or name of the
>> trust it could be helpful.
>>
>> *From:* Steve Jones
>> *Sent:* Saturday, November 18, 2017 3:59 PM
>> *To:* [email protected]
>> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] OT Quandry
>>
>> My sister lives in a group home, same scenario, funding fully from
>> programs. She had a substantial windfal when her pos dad died. Went through
>> a lawyer and got the money into a specific type of trust, its usable as she
>> sees fit, but upon her death the government gets any remaining funds. Its a
>> fairly common setup, but you really need a lawyer to handle it, there are
>> alot of Is and Ts any one of which not being correct can cause ineligibilty
>> for aid
>>
>> If he has the option to take cash value on the prize it would probably be
>> easier to swing.
>>
>> On Nov 18, 2017 3:28 PM, "Chuck McCown" <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>> My nephew is mostly bed bound.  Quad due to spinal fracture about 25
>> years ago (he is 54 I think).  Has almost 100% hand functionality.
>> I have no idea how many government programs support him.  He can use a
>> wheelchair and I bought him a wheelchair van years ago but he really is not
>> healthy enough to use it.
>>
>> So, today he won Richard Petty’s Superbird.
>>
>> http://www.wintheking.com/rules/
>>
>> His sister and her son went back for the drawing.  One of those things
>> where you pick and key and everyone gets in the car and tries to start it.
>>
>> No idea how much this thing is worth but plenty.
>>
>> I wonder if my nephew is going to lose his financial support from the
>> government due to this win?
>> I am sure he is going to have to pay taxes so I am also sure he will have
>> to immediately sell it.
>>
>> Anyone know how welfare works for folks that are 100% disabled and then
>> get a windfall?
>>
>> I really don’t want to ask him about this.  Especially today as I am sure
>> he is pretty excited.  So not gonna be his debbie downer.
>> But having significant IRS issues myself in years past, I immediately
>> start worrying about this kind of thing.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
> --
> Philip J. Rankin
> Wireless Telecommunications Services
> PO Box 24
> Pittsburg, KS  66762
>

Reply via email to