https://blog.streamingmedia.com/2017/11/net-neutrality-is-a-sham.html
Nah, it falls down on its face pretty hard.
Dan basically posits that it's all the fault of transit providers,
completely ignoring the fact that the transit market is a competitive
market whereas last mile providers have a termination monopoly. That's
just silly.
The article is also so full of straw men, it's almost like Dan is
stocking up for a Guy Fawkes festival.
Jared
He points out that the public debate is entirely about ideology. Nobody
has real data, or those who have real data don't share it. I don't see
where he's blaming transit providers for anything. The transit provider
was an example of a technical point that most of the public is unaware
of, but which complicates the discussion. It's also an example of a way
the open internet order could be completely circumvented.....get your
transit provider to do your traffic shaping. They're not an ISP so they
don't count.
Can you point out the straw man?
I consider myself neutral on this topic. I'm willing to consider
arguments, but my problem is that nobody has coherent arguments.
