What, you mean you don't want to build carrier-grade five nines infrastructure out of USB dongles held in place with a hot-glue gun?
On Wed, Nov 29, 2017 at 6:48 AM, Adam Moffett <[email protected]> wrote: > I've been scared of IgniteNet MetroLinq ever since I saw the pictures of > its insides. > > > ------ Original Message ------ > From: "Mathew Howard" <[email protected]> > To: "af" <[email protected]> > Sent: 11/28/2017 9:00:38 PM > Subject: Re: [AFMUG] 11 mile 11ghz gigabitish > > Well, yeah, it depends what all he ends up feeding with it. If it needs > more than what the current AF24 can handle, I wouldn't go to an AF24HD... > An 80ghz link wouldn't even cost all that much more, and then it'll be able > to handle enough bandwidth that you'll probably never have to mess with it > again. There are also other 24ghz radios that would at least give you the > option of smaller antennas, if nothing else. But I'd more than likely just > use an ignitenet. > > On Nov 28, 2017 7:48 PM, "Mike Hammett" <[email protected]> wrote: > >> But can't use the whole gig, so he's looking at AF24HD so he can... >> which are $6k opposed to $1k and don't have SFPs. >> >> Gig upstream - AF24 - multiple 11 GHz channels\polarities. >> >> If he gets his wish and fixes the 11 GHz 1 gigabit issue, the AF24 is now >> the issue. >> >> >> >> ----- >> Mike Hammett >> Intelligent Computing Solutions <http://www.ics-il.com/> >> <https://www.facebook.com/ICSIL> >> <https://plus.google.com/+IntelligentComputingSolutionsDeKalb> >> <https://www.linkedin.com/company/intelligent-computing-solutions> >> <https://twitter.com/ICSIL> >> Midwest Internet Exchange <http://www.midwest-ix.com/> >> <https://www.facebook.com/mdwestix> >> <https://www.linkedin.com/company/midwest-internet-exchange> >> <https://twitter.com/mdwestix> >> The Brothers WISP <http://www.thebrotherswisp.com/> >> <https://www.facebook.com/thebrotherswisp> >> >> >> <https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCXSdfxQv7SpoRQYNyLwntZg> >> ------------------------------ >> *From: *"Mathew Howard" <[email protected]> >> *To: *"af" <[email protected]> >> *Sent: *Tuesday, November 28, 2017 7:27:49 PM >> *Subject: *Re: [AFMUG] 11 mile 11ghz gigabitish >> >> Yeah, but if I'm understanding right, the AF24 link is already there. >> >> On Nov 28, 2017 7:10 PM, "Chris Wright" <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> Everything works beautifully at 700’. At this distance it’s more about >>> cost savings. Don’t waste your time with AF24 when a 60ghz link at 1/3 the >>> cost and twice the throughput will fit the bill perfectly. >>> >>> >>> >>> Chris Wright >>> >>> Network Administrator >>> >>> >>> >>> *From:* Af [mailto:[email protected]] *On Behalf Of *Mathew Howard >>> *Sent:* Tuesday, November 28, 2017 4:59 PM >>> *To:* af >>> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] 11 mile 11ghz gigabitish >>> >>> >>> >>> I wouldn't use IgnetNet if I already had the airFibers there... if it's >>> only going to be feeding an 11ghz link that's around 700ish meg, the AF24 >>> link will handle that perfectly fine, and I see no reason to mess with it. >>> >>> >>> >>> Ignitenets should work beautifully on a 700ft link, but if I only needed >>> 700Mbps, I'd rather have airFibers. If it gets to the point where ~700Mbps >>> isn't enough, then yes, I'd use IgniteNet. >>> >>> >>> >>> On Tue, Nov 28, 2017 at 6:32 PM, Mike Hammett <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> I'd use IgniteNet over airFiber for 700 feet. >>> >>> >>> >>> ----- >>> Mike Hammett >>> Intelligent Computing Solutions <http://www.ics-il.com/> >>> <https://www.facebook.com/ICSIL> >>> <https://plus.google.com/+IntelligentComputingSolutionsDeKalb> >>> <https://www.linkedin.com/company/intelligent-computing-solutions> >>> <https://twitter.com/ICSIL> >>> Midwest Internet Exchange <http://www.midwest-ix.com/> >>> <https://www.facebook.com/mdwestix> >>> <https://www.linkedin.com/company/midwest-internet-exchange> >>> <https://twitter.com/mdwestix> >>> The Brothers WISP <http://www.thebrotherswisp.com/> >>> <https://www.facebook.com/thebrotherswisp> >>> >>> >>> <https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCXSdfxQv7SpoRQYNyLwntZg> >>> ------------------------------ >>> >>> *From: *"Steve Jones" <[email protected]> >>> *To: *[email protected] >>> *Sent: *Tuesday, November 28, 2017 3:28:11 PM >>> *Subject: *[AFMUG] 11 mile 11ghz gigabitish >>> >>> We have a phenomenal saf lumina link we get 366 out of. I can 2+0 this >>> to get to 732. using the existing 3 and 4 foot antennas >>> >>> >>> >>> I wouldnt mind seeing a little more of our gigabit upstream connectivity >>> utilized here, somewhere along the same price using the same antennas >>> >>> >>> >>> Im not at all impressed with the mimosa gear, its not full duplex and >>> putting that much variable latency into the network bringing our bandwidth >>> into the core of our network just seems like moving backward. >>> >>> >>> >>> before I give my blessing, for what its worth, to the boss to order the >>> SAF gear, I just want to make sure there isnt a better option. Lumina is >>> older and nearing EOL im guessing, we have other places the units can be >>> used. >>> >>> >>> >>> on the same note, we bring this bandwidth up from the fiber by AF24 700 >>> feet, so probably should ask about a 24ghz (or anything) short link >>> solution. Im assuming af24hd will meet that need >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >> >>
