I would consider a problem with the power cable used to feed that disk.

On Dec 5, 2017 11:48 PM, "Dev" <[email protected]> wrote:

> Old RAID controllers are notorious for misbehaving and giving false
> readings on drive/volume health. Additionally, the older the controller,
> the harder it is to find good shelf spares with matching model/firmware,
> etc. that will be happy reading your RAID volume(s) in the event of a
> controller failure. This is why I’ve been slowly migrating to a reasonably
> tolerant - like RAID 6 - array which is configured with software RAID in
> the native OS (typically Linux in my case). Nothing wrong with hardware
> RAID, it just can be a little tricky to recover data in the event the
> hardware dies.
>
> With the speed of hardware these days and size of drives, in a 4-drive
> array using RAID 6 you can build some very large volumes with great fault
> tolerance on vanilla hardware with good I/O performance, and even if the
> whole server turns into a smoking hole, you can rebuild your data on some
> other standard hardware. Also, as drives increase in capacity, it’s more
> important to have more than just one volume for parity, two is nice in RAID
> 6.
>
> You might be able to build a new box and start migrating your data in case
> you have a failure and difficulty getting your data. Hardware is usually
> cheaper than the data on it, and peace of mind is nice. Good luck whichever
> way you choose, hope you keep all the important data.
>
> >>
> >
>
> I've got a somewhat old Dell Poweredge with a PERC H700 RAID controller.
>
> About a year ago SMART predicted a failure on disk 4, so I replaced it.
> A few weeks ago SMART predicted a failure on disk 4, so I replaced it.
> Today SMART predicts a failure on disk 4.
>
> On the second incident I have no doubts, because the disk made audible
> noises.  I'm just curious why it's always disk 4.  Can the controller
> conceivably do something that harms the disk?  Just a statistical
> anomaly?
>
> It's a RAID 1+0 by the way, so there should be a nearly identical
> workload on one of the other disks.

Reply via email to