So, as long as you're using the same channels, it's basically just updating the hardware on the license, and you don't have to go through coordination or anything like that? What about if you're currently using a 56mhz channel and go up to 80mhz?
On Wed, Dec 13, 2017 at 10:42 PM, Seth Mattinen <[email protected]> wrote: > On 12/13/17 8:27 PM, Steve Jones wrote: > >> >> Why not license that 57(60) mhz channel at 80 just to have the 80 when we >> relocate it? can we do that? >> > > In 11GHz your choices at the upper end are 40 or 80MHz channels. If you > want to run at any size above 40Mhz then you would ask to license an 80Mhz > channel. For example a SAF Lumina running at 56Mhz would license an 80MHz > channel. > > >> We also have two mimosa links at 80 that id prefer to have nearer the end >> of our network than closer. As long as we dont exceed EIRP and reuse the >> antenna, is there anything stopping us from just replacing these with the >> more stable integra 2+0? >> >> does the fcc care if the hardware changes, but the pattern stays the same >> without exceeding the EIRP? >> > > Yes, you have to modify the license for any changes. > > ~Seth >
