It’s new work. But maybe only $1500 or less for the FCC paperwork. There’s no loopholes to be had.
Jon Langeler Michwave Technologies, Inc. > On Dec 14, 2017, at 12:01 AM, Mathew Howard <[email protected]> wrote: > > So, as long as you're using the same channels, it's basically just updating > the hardware on the license, and you don't have to go through coordination or > anything like that? What about if you're currently using a 56mhz channel and > go up to 80mhz? > >> On Wed, Dec 13, 2017 at 10:42 PM, Seth Mattinen <[email protected]> wrote: >>> On 12/13/17 8:27 PM, Steve Jones wrote: >>> >>> Why not license that 57(60) mhz channel at 80 just to have the 80 when we >>> relocate it? can we do that? >> >> In 11GHz your choices at the upper end are 40 or 80MHz channels. If you want >> to run at any size above 40Mhz then you would ask to license an 80Mhz >> channel. For example a SAF Lumina running at 56Mhz would license an 80MHz >> channel. >> >>> >>> We also have two mimosa links at 80 that id prefer to have nearer the end >>> of our network than closer. As long as we dont exceed EIRP and reuse the >>> antenna, is there anything stopping us from just replacing these with the >>> more stable integra 2+0? >>> >>> does the fcc care if the hardware changes, but the pattern stays the same >>> without exceeding the EIRP? >> >> Yes, you have to modify the license for any changes. >> >> ~Seth >
