This also has a 20 percent tarrif on washing machines not from canada (poke
in mexicos eye, FU nafta).
This actually hits home. My dads rebuilt the maytag in their basement a
couple of washing machines times and its down right now. I had bought an
old used one when i bought my house because i dont want spinout 1000 dollar
electronic junk. He called the mfgr or whoever owns it now and dude told
him, even though it was built in 1985 (yep) hed be better off repairing
again than getting any product on the consumer market today.
Imagine that, going back to products worth fixing, talk about kicking the
lame ass paris climate accord right in the pussy when you stop dumping junk
in landfills and polluting the plabet with asian production of controlled
failure replacement garbage.

On Jan 22, 2018 9:56 PM, "Steve Jones" <[email protected]> wrote:

> My thoughts, same as batteries and just about all electronic industries is
> environmental. Im not a moronic global warming freak, but im a fan of not
> dumping toxins in the groundwater or generating so much smog you create a
> whole industry collecting it and turning it into diamonds.
> Who is the biggest importer of solar cells? Id like to think its us, but i
> figure its more left than that.
> US innovation used to mean that when we build it, we build it best, so how
> far would we have to go to offset our production cost? I do t know that
> efficiency stuff for solar, but id like to think thats where we are going
> to hit it and quit it. That and durabilty. Ill bet too if this forces US
> production, we figure a better solution for snow and condensation, maybe we
> increase efficiency but dont dedicate that to output, we dedicate that to
> heat
>
> On Jan 22, 2018 9:45 PM, "Jaime Solorza" <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
> Well...xxxx xxxxx xxx xxx xxxxx
>
> Jaime Solorza
>
> On Jan 22, 2018 8:36 PM, "Josh Reynolds" <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> Bad.
>>
>> Why do something that reduces the availability of high tech products
>> like this? Every other nation on earth will continue to buy them. It
>> just puts us at more of a disadvantage.
>>
>> On Mon, Jan 22, 2018 at 8:32 PM, Chuck McCown <[email protected]> wrote:
>> > Depends on who you are.  As a consumer bad.
>> >
>> > From: Steve Jones
>> > Sent: Monday, January 22, 2018 6:58 PM
>> > To: [email protected]
>> > Subject: [AFMUG] Solar
>> >
>> > http://thehill.com/policy/energy-environment/370171-trump-im
>> poses-30-tariffs-on-solar-panel-imports
>> >
>> > Good, bad, indifferent?
>>
>
>

Reply via email to