Yeah, it would be nice to see a ruling to stop this from happening again in the future... but my guess is that it's really just an empty threat, and he has no intention of actually suing anybody.
On Thu, Mar 1, 2018 at 10:27 AM, Steve Jones <thatoneguyst...@gmail.com> wrote: > I think this is worth pushing to the nth. I like caselaw, fresh caselaw > that stiffens historic caselaw. I would really like to see at the end of > the day, the letter recipients divvying up airebeams assets with some > sanctions against the attorneys office. We should do a gofundme in the > industry for the recipients to afford the litigation, no settlement, no > dismissal, make it get to a ruling. > > where johnny Cochran > > On Thu, Mar 1, 2018 at 10:13 AM, Mathew Howard <mhoward...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> I wonder how often this kind of thing works to just scare people off >> though... I assume they'd eventually lose an actual lawsuit, but even if >> the new guys know that, there's a good chance that they're not going to >> want to go through the whole mess of getting sued, and just try to keep out >> of their way. >> >> Personally, I think asking nicely to try to avoid interfering with the >> stuff you have up would be a lot more effective... >> >> On Thu, Mar 1, 2018 at 9:48 AM, <ch...@wbmfg.com> wrote: >> >>> Any local judge would be preempted by FCC. >>> >>> *From:* Steve Jones >>> *Sent:* Thursday, March 1, 2018 7:20 AM >>> *To:* af@afmug.com >>> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] anyone seen this letter yet >>> >>> Yeah, that letter isnt about fcc stuff, its about willfully impeding and >>> incumbants operations. This fcc talk os what theyre probably expecting the >>> people to focus on, but thats not their target. This could be interesting >>> to see play out, hopefully it does end up in court just to get fresh >>> caselaw. The new operators in the area may suffer a bit if injunctions are >>> in play, but if they weather it, theyll win, probably get some time and >>> trouble dough in their pockets too. >>> >>> On Mar 1, 2018 7:42 AM, "Chris Fabien" <ch...@lakenetmi.com> wrote: >>> >>>> They can't stop you, but they can sue you! Can sue anybody for anything >>>> in this country right? >>>> >>>> In reality, I think the real answer is, the FCC rules on unlicensed >>>> freqs and how a judge might interpret a case for damages due to lost >>>> business due to provable radio interference, may be two totally different >>>> situations. >>>> >>>> On Thu, Mar 1, 2018 at 8:13 AM, Jaime Solorza < >>>> losguyswirel...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Send them the Part 15 rules...they can't stop you. >>>>> >>>>> Jaime Solorza >>>>> >>>>> On Feb 28, 2018 9:26 PM, "Rory Conaway" <r...@triadwireless.net> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> We cover one of the areas with Airebeam and we can’t install over >>>>>> their old customers fast enough. Ken is backed up at least 3 times what >>>>>> we >>>>>> are backed up. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Rory >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> *From:* Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] *On Behalf Of *Steve Jones >>>>>> *Sent:* Wednesday, February 28, 2018 9:12 PM >>>>>> *To:* af@afmug.com >>>>>> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] anyone seen this letter yet >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> all you need to know about this outfit >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> " Today is a Great Day! I cancelled my Airebeam account and >>>>>> switched to another company. This company has the worst customer service. >>>>>> They also have horrible internet service. They are very unresponsive when >>>>>> there is an issue. (and if they did respond, they always blamed the >>>>>> router.) In my opinion, Greg does not take the responsibility of owning a >>>>>> business and providing quality seriously. >>>>>> Follow up note: >>>>>> When Steven (installer) contacted me to pick up equipment, he stated >>>>>> equipment that wasn't even theirs. He then proceeded to yell at me. I >>>>>> explained to him that he was never to contact me again. The owner, >>>>>> instead >>>>>> of finding a solution, threatened to file theft charges. I am more than >>>>>> happy to return their equipment, but I don't have to put up with their >>>>>> abusive employees." >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> https://www.yelp.com/biz/airebeam-arizona-city >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> not that BBB is legit, but there is this >>>>>> https://www.bbb.org/phoenix/business-reviews/internet-provid >>>>>> ers/airebeam-broadband-in-arizona-city-az-1000033070/reviews >>>>>> -and-complaints >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> On Wed, Feb 28, 2018 at 9:45 PM, Steve Jones < >>>>>> thatoneguyst...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> man, that sucks. He probably paid this lawyer too. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> wouldnt it be crazy though if this was a loophole nobody thought of >>>>>> cause its too dumb to work, but we didnt take into account the level of >>>>>> dumb in the judiciary >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> On Wed, Feb 28, 2018 at 9:39 PM, Rory Conaway <r...@triadwireless.net> >>>>>> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Two guys in Arizona got them but my guess is these people are just >>>>>> fishing. I’ve got my attorneys looking it over and I’m going to make an >>>>>> inquiry to the Attorney General’s office tomorrow. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> *Rory Conaway **• Triad Wireless •** CEO* >>>>>> >>>>>> *4226 S. 37 >>>>>> <https://maps.google.com/?q=4226+S.+37&entry=gmail&source=g>th Street • >>>>>> Phoenix • AZ 85040* >>>>>> >>>>>> *602-426-0542 <(602)%20426-0542>* >>>>>> >>>>>> *r...@triadwireless.net* >>>>>> >>>>>> *www.triadwireless.net <http://www.triadwireless.net/>* >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> *“Yesterdays Home Runs don’t win todays games!”* >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>> >> >
