That is not the way LTE - BBU to Rru data path worksŠ they use fiber with
CPRI interface

https://www.commscope.com/Blog/CommScope-Definitions-What-Is-CPRI/


Its has been a standard for all LTE deployments




On 3/25/18, 5:48 PM, "Af on behalf of George Skorup" <af-boun...@afmug.com



Gino A. Villarini


President
Metro Office Park #18 Suite 304 Guaynabo, Puerto Rico 00968

[cid:aeronet-logo_310cfc3e-6691-4f69-bd49-b37b834b9238.png]

on behalf of george.sko...@cbcast.com> wrote:

>Not the actual RF channel frequencies up the coax. Intermediate
>frequency + power like a split IDU/ODU licensed PTP, which has been a
>reliable method for decades.
>
>On 3/25/2018 3:45 PM, Matt Hoppes wrote:
>> No. I sent that days ago.
>>
>> Ok. Why a split though?  Just to offload some of the cost to a one time
>>purchase?
>>
>> If that¹s the case I hope for a one or two ODU model as well.
>>
>> Also coax will not scale well on some of these frequencies. There¹s a
>>reason everything has gone to Tower mount - even in the cellular world.
>>
>> Do you know how much 100ft of low PIM cable will cost?  Plus the db
>>loss.
>>
>>> On Mar 25, 2018, at 07:47, Adam Moffett <dmmoff...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> Free Unicorn with every purchase.
>>>
>>> It's a split system.  Your EPC is built into the indoor end of the
>>>split system, and you run coax up to a radio head on the tower.  The
>>>indoor unit is supposed to have 8 ports.
>>>
>>> Other than that we know about design goals, but not specifics.  Their
>>>goal is to give you the benefits of LTE, but make it easier/more
>>>accessible.  Price was said to be in between Telrad and Baicells.
>>>
>>> I'm hoping they make a smaller IDU, because at lots of sites we'd pay
>>>for 8 ports and use 1 or 2 of them.
>>>
>>> Is list magically working now?
>>>
>>>
>>> ------ Original Message ------
>>> From: "Matt Hoppes" <mattli...@rivervalleyinternet.net>
>>> To: af@afmug.com
>>> Sent: 3/21/2018 3:36:39 PM
>>> Subject: [AFMUG] Cambium LTE
>>>
>>>> What¹s known about the Cambium LTE product so far?
>

Reply via email to