http://www.advantec.it/wp-content/uploads/cambium/pdf/cambium_networks_PTP550_Advantec.pdf
On Wed, Apr 25, 2018 at 1:58 PM, Joe Novak <[email protected]> wrote: > I've definitely done some stupid things with PTP 5ghz. With in a few > hundred foot I may or may not have a few micro-pops humming along with NLOS > shots. It's definitely not a predictable layout though, you just have to > test it. > > On Wed, Apr 25, 2018 at 3:52 PM, Steve Jones <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> No ptp650 magic sauce like you may be expecting. It performs exactly as >> ptp3/500 did in regard to that. Like anything you can get "nLOS" but you >> pay for it with capacity/reliability >> turning dual payload off gets you "sauce" at the expense of half your >> capacity, and IIRC theres another setting regarding throughput vs >> stability. 5ghz is 5ghz in this context. you can barely penetrate a fart, >> tree leaves are out of the question >> >> On Wed, Apr 25, 2018 at 3:16 PM, C Stanners <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> Orthogon-based PTP650/670 have something like 256/512 subcarriers which >>> helps NLOS. I think AF5X has 1 and AF5XHD has 8 subcarriers? >>> >>> On Wed, Apr 25, 2018 at 3:10 PM, Christopher Gray < >>> [email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> I've been told the PTP650 (and 670) have some sort of magic that helps >>>> with NLOS links. I've always assume this was a result of the custom >>>> chipset. Do these radios actually perform better than others in similar >>>> signal NLOS environments? >>>> >>>> The PTP550 is based on a WiFi chipset... does it have any of the NLOS >>>> magic? >>>> >>>> >>>> In NLOS situations, would the PTP650 / PTP550 be expected to >>>> significantly outperform the airFiber-X hardware? >>>> >>>> Thank you - Chris >>>> >>>> >>> >> >
