They claim nLOS not NLOS. To cambium, 1/16 fresnel impact is nLOS On Wed, Apr 25, 2018, 5:52 PM Christopher Gray <[email protected]> wrote:
> I'm definitely not expecting Cambium to go through a forest in 5 GHz... > but they specifically claim NLOS capability. > > I have several NLOS 5 GHz links going through leaves at very short ranges > that are relatively stable (all ePMP). I'm just curious about what makes > them claim their NLOS is better. > > I'll look into the subcarries as Stanners suggested. > > > > ------------------------------ > > On Wed, Apr 25, 2018 at 4:13 PM, Josh Baird <[email protected]> wrote: > >> NLOS "magic" in 5ghz? Don't hold your breath, man. >> >> On Wed, Apr 25, 2018 at 4:10 PM, Christopher Gray < >> [email protected]> wrote: >> >>> I've been told the PTP650 (and 670) have some sort of magic that helps >>> with NLOS links. I've always assume this was a result of the custom >>> chipset. Do these radios actually perform better than others in similar >>> signal NLOS environments? >>> >>> The PTP550 is based on a WiFi chipset... does it have any of the NLOS >>> magic? >>> >>> >>> In NLOS situations, would the PTP650 / PTP550 be expected to >>> significantly outperform the airFiber-X hardware? >>> >>> Thank you - Chris >>> >>> >> >
