On 2/Jun/16 09:13, Willy MANGA wrote:
> Hi, > I guess some of you have already read that article but let me give you > the link: > > https://blogs.akamai.com/2016/06/preparing-for-ipv6-only-mobile-networks-why-and-how.html > > > So, can we really move forward guys ? :) In my experience, the economic incentive to keep NAT444 in mobile networks vs. going any kind of IPv6 is balanced more in favour of the former. I applaud folk like Apple using their market power to "force the issue". How mobile operators will react to that will be interesting, but it could make for a lot more impact of Android did the same. This one will be hard to predict, especially when a good portion of the capex budget of the typical large scale mobile operator goes to NAT444. Mark.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ AfrIPv6-Discuss mailing list [email protected] https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/afripv6-discuss
