On 2/Jun/16 16:39, JORDI PALET MARTINEZ wrote:
> I don’t think NAT444 reduces cost even initially … You need to buy the boxes, > you have more radio bandwidth used for the keep-alives, etc., even more power > consumption. > > It may be a case by case, for example if you existing network doesn’t support > IPv6, or the majority of your uses doen’t have smartphones with IPv6 support, > etc. The amount of effort required in making sure your customer's phones support IPv6, as well as having the back-end systems updated to match, is too daunting for most mobile operators, taken from the point of view of what they can immediately gain, but spending a couple of millions of NAT444 today to earn billions tomorrow. The desire for change has to be fundamental. Mark. _______________________________________________ AfrIPv6-Discuss mailing list [email protected] https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/afripv6-discuss
