Hello Omo,

Le 20/04/2017 à 11:45, Omo Oaiya a écrit :
> 
>> On 20 Apr 2017, at 11:28, Willy MANGA <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>> On universities field where we are involved, from my point of view that
>> should even be mandatory. I will continue to say that there are no
>> reasons to not use v6 today (not tomorrow).
>>
> 
> There are some reasons why v6 cannot be used today.   Upstreams who don’t 
> offer v6 is one.  Another is cost to retool and the resulting inertia

Agree but we should continue to push forward.

> In AfricaConnect2, and preceding AfricaConnect, v6 was offered from the start 
> so we will resolve the upstream issue, at least for NRENs and connected 
> universities

I'm currently dealing with my colleagues of higher education in Cameroon
here to give v6 prefixes to the universities (on 2c0f:f6a0::/32 block).
Hopefully, at least one campus before the end of 2017 will start to use it.


>> Concerning MIT statement it depends on where you stand. They will
>> migrate completely to v6 because they will not «have to worry about the
>> proliferation of smart phones, the Internet of Things, or whatever comes
>> next» . Our universities have to follow that path in my humble opinion.
> 
> As you pointed out earlier in the blog, MIT is selling some of their IPv4 
> stock to fund this and will complete in 2019 despite these significant 
> resources.
> 
> I am not saying African universities cannot lead the way, but it takes more 
> than wishing it.

Agree but with more people concerned,

>>
>> Here in Cameroon, v6 networks work quite well in our networks (Yaounde
>> [1],Ngaoundere [2]) and we'll continue to push its development in the
>> region.
> 
> 
> You are having to tunnel via v4.   I know a number of universities that ran 
> such tunnels as far back as 2010.   They didn’t see the point in maintaining 
> them.


> You may be able to connect to the v6 Internet this way but you appearing on 
> it as an American company.  I wouldn’t call this working quite well.  We can 
> make it work better.

We are no more behind a tunnel :) . That was 1 year ago !!  We are using
native IPv6 both on our 2 sites. :) . our block : 2001:4268:1a1::/48

Same actions are in the pipe with Gabon actually.



-- 
Willy Ted MANGA
Responsable Technique Régional | DACGL
https://www.auf.org/bacgl

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

_______________________________________________
AfrIPv6-Discuss mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/afripv6-discuss

Reply via email to