On Fri, Aug 29, 2008 at 3:42 PM, Jeffrey Hutzelman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: ... > Would you be satisfied with language allowing the registrars to eject one of > their own? If not, what else do you think is necessary? >
Yes. > Note that if the registrar process breaks, the standardization group is > always free to pick up the pieces (tables) and do the job some other way. > >> I think it will also help registrars in recruiting new ones: for example: > > Maybe, but that's not a reason to set it down in the stone of a process > document. If the registrars want to ask for commitments for a particular > length of time, or review membership periodically, let them decide that. > > That's a good point. And I'm fine with letting the registrars decide that on their own (and change it as they need w/o needing to get the full weight of the standardizations process involved). -- Steven Jenkins End Point Corporation http://www.endpoint.com/ _______________________________________________ AFS3-standardization mailing list [email protected] http://michigan-openafs-lists.central.org/mailman/listinfo/afs3-standardization
