On Sat, 30 Aug 2008, Simon Wilkinson wrote: > > On 29 Aug 2008, at 21:04, Jeffrey Hutzelman wrote: > > > OK, then. Now let's see if we can agree on some text. I'll > > propose the following as a replacement for the next-to-last > > paragraph of 2.3.2: > > > > This combination of roles makes it difficult for a single > > individual to serve as registrar. Instead, it is proposed to > > expand the role of registrar to include a number of individuals > > from the community. This group would initially be composed as > > described in section 3. > > > > Once established, the registrars set their own procedures for > > adding new registrars, removing registrars, and determining the > > size of the group. In the event there are no registrars, a new > > group will be formed consisting of one representative from each > > active AFS implementation and one representative chosen by the > > chairs. > > > > I would also add the following sentence to the last paragraph of > > 2.3.2: > > > > The registrars must make the current set of registries available to > > the community, including versions in the preferred source form. > > I'm happy to adopt these. In an ideal world, I'd like to keep the > bootstrapping details separate from the core document - so I'd prefer > to delete the final sentence of your first paragraph, if that's > acceptable, and remove "Once established" from the first sentence of > the second.
Sure, I don't have a problem with that. _______________________________________________ AFS3-standardization mailing list [email protected] http://michigan-openafs-lists.central.org/mailman/listinfo/afs3-standardization
