> I'm not sure what you mean by "voting members". But yes, if a given > implementation doesn't care to nominate a registrar, we'll just have to have > fewer bootstrap registrars. We can't force people to serve. > > Is it worth checking out each of the current implementations, seeing if the community/developers are willing/able to provide a registrar, and modify the document accordingly? It seems misleading to provide stipulation as to who will be part of the bootstrap process, and then potentially have some implementations not provide a registrar.
On a completely unrelated note, On pg. 6, the first paragraph, that reads In addition, by submitting this Internet-Draft, to the extent that this Internet-Draft or any portionthereof is protected by copyright and other rights of authorship, the Contributor, and each named co-Contributor, and the organization he or she represents or is sponsored by (if any) grant a perpetual, irrevocable, non-exclusive, royalty-free, world-wide right and license to any and all persons under all intellectual property rights in this Internet-Draft: should say "[...]or any portion thereof[...]". Minor spelling stuff, but important nonetheless :) -- Jacob Thebault-Spieker Cell: (320) 288-6412 http://summatusmentis.wordpress.com
_______________________________________________ AFS3-standardization mailing list [email protected] http://michigan-openafs-lists.central.org/mailman/listinfo/afs3-standardization
