--On Thursday, September 04, 2008 05:50:02 PM +0100 Simon Wilkinson
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 29 Aug 2008, at 20:17, Jeffrey Hutzelman wrote:
I think it is fine to designate the vote-taker(s) as breaking the
tie in the event there is no returning chair.
Separately, if we are going to give anyone a casting vote, we need
to be clear as to whether they also hold a normal vote.
I'd say that the vote-taker(s) as a body have a single casting vote. Each
vote taker individually may hold a normal vote, in the same way as any
other voter.
Works for me.
-- Jeff
_______________________________________________
AFS3-standardization mailing list
[email protected]
http://michigan-openafs-lists.central.org/mailman/listinfo/afs3-standardization
