> Finally, it does raise the question of what the copyright of the > finished document actually is. Is the new standardisation document, > in effect, a derivative of the original XG files, and so IPL'd? Are > the XDR and RPC descriptions contained within that document under > the IPL, and so unusable by GPL (or commercial) implementors?
If you think it's a derivate, make it a derivate of the Arla equivalent which has less copyright problems than the IPL. Harald. _______________________________________________ AFS3-standardization mailing list [email protected] http://michigan-openafs-lists.central.org/mailman/listinfo/afs3-standardization
