> Here's the important bit again: > > Please take the time to review draft-wilkinson-afs3-standardization-00.txt. > Send your questions and comments to <[email protected]>. > Please comment even if it's just to say "I support this" or "I oppose this". > Please send your comments in by Wednesday, July 21, 2010.
I support this. In particular, if the various AFS implementations are to gain wider traction, notably if any vendor is ever to take an interest in directly providing an implementation, I feel that formalizing a procedure for extension and definition of what AFS "is", is if not necessary at least highly desirable, and this provides a suitable vessel for doing so. Derrick speaking as some guy off the street _______________________________________________ AFS3-standardization mailing list [email protected] http://michigan-openafs-lists.central.org/mailman/listinfo/afs3-standardization
