On Wed, 07 Jul 2010 19:08:12 -0400 Jeffrey Hutzelman <[email protected]> wrote:
> Please take the time to review > draft-wilkinson-afs3-standardization-00.txt. Send your questions and > comments to <[email protected]>. Please comment even > if it's just to say "I support this" or "I oppose this". Please send > your comments in by Wednesday, July 21, 2010. I support this. I'd like to bring attention to a couple of things about the charter, but these don't affect my support, and I certainly don't want these to hold up moving forwards. Anyway: I don't think I see anything mentioning a process for changing the AFS standardization process itself. Is it perhaps just the same as submitting a proposal for the AFS protocol? Also, >> 2.3.3. Document States and Series >>[...] >> The intention is that standard documents will be submitted by their >> authors to the RFC-Editor as an individual submission. Upon >> successful completion of the RFC-Editor process, the resulting RFCs >> should be linked to by the group chairs, and referenced by the >> relevant registries. Whilst this usage appears consistent with the >> individual submission process, it needs to be confirmed that the RFC >> Editor is happy with this. Has this been done? -- Andrew Deason [email protected] _______________________________________________ AFS3-standardization mailing list [email protected] http://michigan-openafs-lists.central.org/mailman/listinfo/afs3-standardization
