On 11/12/2010 10:36 AM, Steve Simmons wrote: > > If David doesn't surface after appropriate nagging, we could punt the issue > to the IETF higher-ups for guidance. > > We could ask the voters to re-send their votes to a different vote counter. > I'd be happy to receive them. With Thomas Kula right down the hall, it would > be fast and easy to keep on top of the incoming votes and nag those voters > who hadn't re-sent. This assumes, of course, that it doesn't cause the IETF > higher-ups to have a conniption.
There are no IETF higher ups. The AFS3 Standardization process is not part of the IETF. Personally I think we need to move on. This process has been drawn out too long as it is. We are supposed to be modeled on the ideas of the IETF consensus decision making process. I think that the elected chairs need to decide whether or not there is consensus to move forward or not. Jeffrey Altman
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ AFS3-standardization mailing list [email protected] http://michigan-openafs-lists.central.org/mailman/listinfo/afs3-standardization
