On 11/12/2010 11:00 PM, Douglas E. Engert wrote:
I move, that without objection from the two vote counters who should
have the final say in the mater, that we have a 1 week call for
consensus starting now, that the election results are adopted.
[email protected] has seconded this.
If we are to move on and have chairs, without the third vote counter
we should call for a vote of consensus, on moving on. I was hopping the
2 vote counters would have done this, but they have only expressed their
personal options.
So far I have heard two options:
(1) Move on with the two chairs, Hartmut and myself
(2) Hold a new election. (I think this was expressed in frustration.)
No one has expressed an option that there was any problem with the vote
count,
and the third vote count has been silent.
I was going to suggest something along those lines. Option (3) as I see
it is consenting that both (a) the rules need amending as per Kim's
suggestions and (b) these amendments should apply retroactively to the
past election.
But your's is simpler ;-)
Consider (1) seconded (no pun intended).
Sincerely,
Felix
_______________________________________________
AFS3-standardization mailing list
[email protected]
http://michigan-openafs-lists.central.org/mailman/listinfo/afs3-standardization
