On Dec 7, 2010 10:47 AM, "Tom Keiser" <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Hi All,
>
> Now that the elections are complete, I'd like to make a second call
> for review of draft-tkeiser-afs3-volser-tlv-03.  Any feedback would be
> greatly appreciated.
>

Question: when I introduced AFSVOL_TLV_TYPE_TIME_ABS and
AFSVOL_TLV_TYPE_TIME_ABS_VEC in draft -03, I mapped them to uint64 types;
would it be preferable for them to be signed?

-Tom

> Cheers,
>
> -Tom
>
>
> Tom Keiser <[email protected]> wrote:
> > The other week I submitted a new draft to the IETF which implements
> > the aforementioned changes (as well as a few others).  The new draft
> > is available at the following URLs:
> >
> > http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-tkeiser-afs3-volser-tlv-03
> >
http://openafs.sinenomine.net/~tkeiser/i-d/draft-tkeiser-afs3-volser-tlv-03.html
> >
http://openafs.sinenomine.net/~tkeiser/i-d/draft-tkeiser-afs3-volser-tlv-03.xml
> >
http://openafs.sinenomine.net/~tkeiser/i-d/draft-tkeiser-afs3-volser-tlv-02-03.xml.diff
> >
> > /afs/
sinenomine.net/user/tkeiser/public_html/i-d/draft-tkeiser-afs3-volser-tlv-03.txt
> > /afs/
sinenomine.net/user/tkeiser/public_html/i-d/draft-tkeiser-afs3-volser-tlv-03.html
> > /afs/
sinenomine.net/user/tkeiser/public_html/i-d/draft-tkeiser-afs3-volser-tlv-03.xml
> > /afs/
sinenomine.net/user/tkeiser/public_html/i-d/draft-tkeiser-afs3-volser-tlv-02-03.xml.diff
> >
> >
> > The complete revision history is as follows:
> >
> > - split unsigned 64-bit type down into several more descriptive types
> > that allow the TLV data stream to be more self-describing.
> > - add a signed 64-bit integer type to allow for relative timestamps
> > - now that we have more descriptive types, use them in a number of
places
> > - change AFSVOL_TLV_TAG_VOL_TRANS_CALL_VALID into a boolean type payload
> > - make sure rxgen can parse the XDR in the appendix
> > - make sure generated C code compiles and links
> > - add in-text cites for AFS3-VVL, AFS3-FSCM, DAFS, and OSD.
> > - provide motivations for GetCapabilities RPC
> > - provide protocol semantic definitions for each newly allocated
capability bit
> > - allocate AFSVOL_TLV_FLAG_MORE bit to notify caller when we can't
> > send all tags due to AFSVOL_TLV_TAG_MAX length limit
> >
> > Any comments or feedback are appreciated.
> >
> > -Tom
> >

Reply via email to