Hi, My comment wasn't meant to add complexity to something simple, or put stuff in any craws. I would like to see us approach the union issue quickly, with a view to making safe unions easy for developers inventing extensible RPCs.
Matt ----- "Derrick Brashear" <[email protected]> wrote: > On Fri, Feb 11, 2011 at 3:37 AM, Simon Wilkinson <[email protected]> > I think this is going to require more standardisation > and > > implementation work. I'm definitely interested in seeing that work > done, but > > I don't think we should delay moving forward with addresses on > waiting for > > that to happen. > > I agree with that summary, and had went to bed with the same idea in > my craw. > > -- > Derrick -- Matt Benjamin The Linux Box 206 South Fifth Ave. Suite 150 Ann Arbor, MI 48104 http://linuxbox.com tel. 734-761-4689 fax. 734-769-8938 cel. 734-216-5309 _______________________________________________ AFS3-standardization mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openafs.org/mailman/listinfo/afs3-standardization
