On Fri, Mar 11, 2011 at 4:31 PM, Andrew Deason <[email protected]> wrote: > On Fri, 4 Mar 2011 15:06:50 -0600 > Andrew Deason <[email protected]> wrote: > >> On Tue, 1 Mar 2011 13:06:00 -0600 >> Andrew Deason <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> > A new version (-01) of the I-D draft-deason-afs3-getsizev2 has been >> > submitted to the IETF: >> > >> > <http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-deason-afs3-getsizev2/> >> >> After some discussion with Tom Keiser, there are some new changes for >> an -02 in progress: > > draft-deason-afs3-getsizev2-02 has been published, which includes those > changes. It is again available at > <http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-deason-afs3-getsizev2/> >
Hi Andrew, Thanks for incorporating my suggestions, and for moving this draft forward. Upon re-reading, I actually have two more nits (indexed by idnits line numbers), and one, imho, substantive issue: 1) line 213: Although I guess it's clear from the section title, starting the section with the pronoun "this" threw me off a smidgen (probably just me unconsciously skipping section titles) 2) line 276: I think it might be better to call it the "OpenAFS Basic OverSeer UserList", since UserList isn't a standardized interface 3) Section 8: AIUI, when we allocate a new namespace, it is customary to prescribe an allocation policy for the namespace (e.g., AFS3-STDS Consensus--see http://lists.openafs.org/pipermail/afs3-standardization/2010-April/000669.html for further details from JHutz) Cheers, -Tom _______________________________________________ AFS3-standardization mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openafs.org/mailman/listinfo/afs3-standardization
