On Fri, 11 Mar 2011 17:07:36 -0500
Tom Keiser <[email protected]> wrote:

> 1) line 213:

ACK

> 2) line 276:

ACK

> 3) Section 8: AIUI, when we allocate a new namespace, it is customary
> to prescribe an allocation policy for the namespace (e.g., AFS3-STDS
> Consensus--see 
> http://lists.openafs.org/pipermail/afs3-standardization/2010-April/000669.html
> for further details from JHutz)

Yeah, that's fine with me. I'd like to give more than half to the
registrar, given the small amount of bitspace available. Would 24 bits
for the registrar and 8 bits for "private use" be okay, or is that too
lop-sided?

Should we say anything about AFSVolDumpV2 flag namespace allocation at
the same time, or should it just be left alone as an extant RPC?

-- 
Andrew Deason
[email protected]

_______________________________________________
AFS3-standardization mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.openafs.org/mailman/listinfo/afs3-standardization

Reply via email to