On 5/3/2011 2:19 PM, Andrew Deason wrote:
On Tue, 03 May 2011 10:26:56 -0500
"Douglas E. Engert"<[email protected]> wrote:
Nevil Browmlee has responded to our query about getting
our AFS3 documents published. I have responded with the note below,
but want input from the group:
Is the paragraph below OK?
Looks fine to me.
Who could we get as independent reviewers of the documents?
I think I am missing something here. Does the phrase "independent
reviewer" mean something specific and special in the IETF independent
submissions process? I thought having independent reviewers looking over
the doc is what we've _been_ doing for the past few months.
We have in effect been a WG. The IETF will get additional people
to look over documents, but as Jeff pointed out they could be
part of the WG.
Having someone not familiar with AFS might help catch some issues
where the authors and WG where too close to the subject, and made
some assumptions that a future developer might misinterpret.
Do we have anyone we could call on? Maybe someone who uses AFS,
is involved with the IETF, but has not been part of the group?
--
Douglas E. Engert <[email protected]>
Argonne National Laboratory
9700 South Cass Avenue
Argonne, Illinois 60439
(630) 252-5444
_______________________________________________
AFS3-standardization mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.openafs.org/mailman/listinfo/afs3-standardization
