On Tue, 03 May 2011 15:39:46 -0500 "Douglas E. Engert" <[email protected]> wrote:
> >> Who could we get as independent reviewers of the documents? > > > > I think I am missing something here. Does the phrase "independent > > reviewer" mean something specific and special in the IETF > > independent submissions process? I thought having independent > > reviewers looking over the doc is what we've _been_ doing for the > > past few months. > > We have in effect been a WG. The IETF will get additional people > to look over documents, but as Jeff pointed out they could be > part of the WG. > > Having someone not familiar with AFS might help catch some issues > where the authors and WG where too close to the subject, and made > some assumptions that a future developer might misinterpret. Okay, "independent" as in "independent from AFS-3". That makes more sense, and I agree with its utility. -- Andrew Deason [email protected] _______________________________________________ AFS3-standardization mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openafs.org/mailman/listinfo/afs3-standardization
