On Mon, 20 Jun 2011 12:36:20 -0500 Andrew Deason <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Tue, 31 May 2011 14:39:47 -0500 > Andrew Deason <[email protected]> wrote: > > > draft-deason-afs3-type-time-02 has been posted and is available at > > > > <http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-deason-afs3-type-time/> > > Second call for review; any comments welcomed. Last call for review. After this, I believe a chair makes a call for consensus? Or do I need to formally "propose" a call for consensus and a chair carries it out? (Do I need to "do" anything here, assuming no further comments or substantive changes in the doc?) -- Andrew Deason [email protected] _______________________________________________ AFS3-standardization mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openafs.org/mailman/listinfo/afs3-standardization
