On 7/15/2011 11:27 AM, Andrew Deason wrote:
On Mon, 20 Jun 2011 12:36:20 -0500
Andrew Deason<[email protected]> wrote:
On Tue, 31 May 2011 14:39:47 -0500
Andrew Deason<[email protected]> wrote:
draft-deason-afs3-type-time-02 has been posted and is available at
<http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-deason-afs3-type-time/>
Second call for review; any comments welcomed.
Last call for review. After this, I believe a chair makes a call for
consensus?
Yes.
Or do I need to formally "propose" a call for consensus and a
chair carries it out?
I will take this e-mail as you think it is ready.
(Do I need to "do" anything here, assuming no
further comments or substantive changes in the doc?)
Not yet. If we all agree on it, then we need to get it to the
IETF RFC editor. We may have to change some of the boiler plate
based on the RFC Editor's comments.
--
Douglas E. Engert <[email protected]>
Argonne National Laboratory
9700 South Cass Avenue
Argonne, Illinois 60439
(630) 252-5444
_______________________________________________
AFS3-standardization mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.openafs.org/mailman/listinfo/afs3-standardization
