Based on all the discussions of the last few days, there are enough
questions and concern that in the option of this chair, there is no
consensus for draft-deason-afs3-type-time-02.
We will need to continue the discussions, and make changes in the
next draft.
On 7/26/2011 8:25 AM, Douglas E. Engert wrote:
This call for consensus was to extend to 7/25 yesterday.
So far I have only seen 2 "OK" responses from Derrick Brashear
and David Boyes, and a "why are we doing this" from an outsider.
In the view of this chair, that does not constitute a consensus,
and I will extend the call till Friday 7/29.
On 7/15/2011 1:11 PM, Douglas E. Engert wrote:
We have a request to proceed with a call for consensus on:
http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-deason-afs3-type-time/
Our draft procedures say a call should last at least 1 week,
and this being Friday afternoon, I would like to extend the
period to Monday, 7/25/2011.
Consensus as used by the IETF is not a vote but a general agreement
by the working group that the draft has addressed all issues.
If there is someone who strongly disagrees with some issue the group
should make ever effort to understand the issue even if the one making
the point is having trouble expressing the issue.
Members should read the document and if you have issues please state
them and indicate what needs to be changed. If you have no issues, let
us know that too.
Please respond using the subject from this e-mail.
--
Douglas E. Engert <[email protected]>
Argonne National Laboratory
9700 South Cass Avenue
Argonne, Illinois 60439
(630) 252-5444
_______________________________________________
AFS3-standardization mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.openafs.org/mailman/listinfo/afs3-standardization
