> > I was concerned that bringing this up would be rehashing old > arguments, but I was unable to find any discussion of this in the > afs3-standardization mailing list archives.
I didn't say it was on the list, did I? Now, perhaps it should have been, but... > If those old archives are available in a public fashion somewhere, I The archive I pointed to appears to be correct. > would be happy to review those before commenting further on this > section of the proposal. -- Derrick _______________________________________________ AFS3-standardization mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openafs.org/mailman/listinfo/afs3-standardization
