I pushed draft-keiser-afs3-xdr-union-03 (incorporating Derrick's grammatical corrections) to the IETF last week. Comments are hereby solicited.
http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-keiser-afs3-xdr-union-03 Cheers, -Tom On Jul 20, 2011 8:46 PM, "Tom Keiser" <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Derrick, > > Thanks very much for the review; I'll incorporate those edits. > > I'd like to publish -03 on Tuesday. If any interested party can find time to send comments by Monday, it would be greatly appreciated. > > Cheers, > > -Tom > > Sent from my phone; please excuse any typographic or grammatical errors. > > -----Original Message----- > From: Derrick Brashear [[email protected]] > Received: Wednesday, 20 Jul 2011, 9:33am > To: Tom Keiser [[email protected]] > Subject: Re: [AFS3-std] Re: XDR extensible union type > > i lie > > "1. Lookup the discriminant" > > I believe that should be, as an operation, "look up" > > > On Wed, Jul 20, 2011 at 9:31 AM, Derrick Brashear <[email protected]> wrote: >> 6. AFS Assign Numbers Registrar Considerations >> >> "Assigned" >> >> the actual content is fine and i see no issues. >> >> On Tue, Jul 19, 2011 at 6:02 PM, Tom Keiser <[email protected]> wrote: >>> On Jun 20, 2011 2:41 PM, "Tom Keiser" <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> Hi all, >>>> >>>> I pushed a new revision of draft-keiser-afs3-xdr-union: >>>> >>>> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-keiser-afs3-xdr-union-02 >>>> >>>> This revision incorporates the following two changes: >>>> >>>> * modify section on error handling (3.4.1) to make length mismatches a >>>> fatal error >>>> * add a "use case" section (1.1) to discuss trade-offs associated with >>>> using this type >>>> >>>> Any comments are welcome. >>>> >>>> -Tom >>> >>> This is a second call for review of draft-keiser-afs3-xdr-union-02; all >>> comments are welcome. >>> >>> Cheers, >>> >>> -Tom >> >> >> >> -- >> Derrick >> > > > > -- > Derrick
