On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 11:29 AM, Matt W. Benjamin <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi, > > I think my intuition is that an implementation should stop when the implied > length becomes absurd. Your idea of a max leg length does seem helpful, > since it lets us have a shared definition of what is unreasonable. >
Matt, Thank you for your comments. I am inclined to publish a -04 incorporating the grammar extensions I outlined a few weeks ago. However, that will delay resolution of this document by a minimum of six weeks (although, given Doug's comments regarding a preference for serialization on draft-brashear-afs3-pts-extended-names, this is unlikely to introduce any real latency). Unless I hear objections, I will publish a -04 early next week. Cheers, -Tom _______________________________________________ AFS3-standardization mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openafs.org/mailman/listinfo/afs3-standardization
