On Wed, 23 Jan 2013 18:00:54 -0500 Benjamin Kaduk <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Tue, 22 Jan 2013, Michael Meffie wrote: > > > I hope we do not need to make any more changes to the rxgk document, but > > as we discussed, it may be wise to progress rxgk and rxgk-afs as a set. > > > > That being said, are there any objections to starting the review of rxgk-afs > > in earnest and tabling all discussion on the rxgk document? > > That sounds good. > > > Can we get a list of the open issues and a time line on when we think we can > > have a draft for review? > > Hmm, when I first read this mail I read this as open issues with the rxgk > draft, but now I think you meant the rxgk-afs draft. Yes, that is what I meant, a timeline so we can move forward with the rxgk-afs i-d. > I will plan to do the same historical research for rxgk-afs that I did for > rxgk, hopefully this week. I won't have an idea of what the timeline will > be until I've done that research. I seem to recall that this document > needed more work than the base rxgk document, though. Ok, thank you. Re-reading the previous threads, I see Andrew started some dicussions in June 2012. There were three categories; trivial/typo's, non-trival comments, and section 10 (callbacks). Simon mentioned he had made corrections for the typos, and it seems some updates for the non-trival comments to his draft. There was a long response from Simon regarding the background for section 10 (callbacks). > We could update > http://afs3-stds.central.org/working/draft-wilkinson-afs3-rxgk/issues.html > with a few things so as to not lose track of them, though they are minor: > Length limits on variable-length arrays > Discussion of putting errors in RX aborts vs. in-band error fields > Correct the client's termination condition for the GSSNegotiate RPC Updated. Thanks Ben. Best regards, Mike -- Michael Meffie <[email protected]> _______________________________________________ AFS3-standardization mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openafs.org/mailman/listinfo/afs3-standardization
