It seems you’re taking a deep learning approach to the classic cognitive architectures - like you’re reengineering ACT-R.
What’s different? Why is this any better? Sent from ProtonMail Mobile On Mon, Jun 11, 2018 at 1:25 AM, YKY via AGI <agi@agi.topicbox.com> wrote: > Ooops, sorry, there is a serious bug: I focused too much on the propositional > structure and neglected the first-order structure, as a result the latter is > lost, and the machine becomes a purely propositional one... 😖 > > But this experience allowed me to understand the logical structure better... > and you can see the direction where I'm heading... > > On Mon, Jun 11, 2018 at 2:56 AM, YKY (Yan King Yin, 甄景贤) > <generic.intellige...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Hi friends 😄 >> >> My latest AGI architecture: >> https://drive.google.com/open?id=1UWSwlfBX_rfyRN1jO-WaYOaVMZWjrVoU >> >> Chinese version: >> https://drive.google.com/open?id=13DcmVo9RkyMVgL37Il2gK5yt6G3zEVLM >> Comments and suggestions are welcome. >> Email me if you're interested to help develop it :) > > [Artificial General Intelligence List](https://agi.topicbox.com/latest) / AGI > / see [discussions](https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi) + > [participants](https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi/members) + [delivery > options](https://agi.topicbox.com/groups) > [Permalink](https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi/T731509cdd81e3f5f-Me8fbb559a7e2d6cc1947e4ab) ------------------------------------------ Artificial General Intelligence List: AGI Permalink: https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi/T731509cdd81e3f5f-M25739fd18208ca9789ed8b42 Delivery options: https://agi.topicbox.com/groups
